| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also use default defintions for PKG_SOURCE_SUBDIR, PKG_SOURCE
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace *MD5SUM with *HASH, replace MD5 hashes with SHA256
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Change git packages to xz
* Update mirror checksums in packages where they are used
* Change a few source tarballs to xz if available upstream
* Remove unused lines in packages we're touching, requested by jow- and blogic
* We're relying more on xz-utils so add official mirror as primary source, master site as secondary.
* Add SHA256 checksums to multiple git tarball packages
Signed-off-by: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Thill <nico@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 44498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info.
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 43167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 43151
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
target (#14324)
SVN-Revision: 38411
|
|
|
|
| |
SVN-Revision: 35508
|
|
with the release tarball
SVN-Revision: 35498
|