openwrt/upstream - upstream openwrt

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	cosmetic: remove trailing whitespaces	Luka Perkov	2015-10-15	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov <luka@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 47197
*	qos-scripts: drop obsolete depdendency on iptabes-mod-filter (#19506)	Felix Fietkau	2015-04-17	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 45482
*	qos-scripts: bump PKG_REVISION and copyright year	Jo-Philipp Wich	2015-01-06	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jow@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 43860
*	license info - revert r43155	John Crispin	2014-11-03	1	-3/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info. Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 43167
*	Add more license tags with SPDX identifiers	John Crispin	2014-11-03	1	-0/+3
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied together - each with different licensing information in the file headers. I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license in my opinion. However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information and/or did not miss license information. Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de> SVN-Revision: 43155
*	add myself as a maintainer for a few more packages	Felix Fietkau	2012-10-10	1	-0/+2
\| \| \| \|	SVN-Revision: 33693
*	packages: sort network related packages into package/network/	Felix Fietkau	2012-10-10	1	-0/+50
	SVN-Revision: 33688