| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
v$(PKG_VERSION).tar.gz is a bad idea and will clash for obvious reasons.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The previous link did not work here.
Compile-tested on: bcm47xx
Runtime-tested on: bcm47xx
Signed-off-by: Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace *MD5SUM with *HASH, replace MD5 hashes with SHA256
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Update libconfig to 1.5
Signed-off-by: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info.
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 43167
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 43151
|
|
|
maintainer
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 37552
|
