| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 46588
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This brings oprifle to version 1.1.0-rc2 and adds some fixes for musl.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
SVN-Revision: 46505
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 45525
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 45280
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Thill <nico@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 44398
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info.
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 43167
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 43151
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 41035
|
|
|
SVN-Revision: 33705
|
