openwrt/upstream - upstream openwrt

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	binutils/oprofile: disable mips16 to fix build errors (#19522)	Felix Fietkau	2015-04-20	1	-0/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 45525
*	oprofile: add dependency on librt, it seems to be needed in some configurations	Felix Fietkau	2015-04-06	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 45280
*	oprofile: mark broken on uml	Nicolas Thill	2015-02-11	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Nicolas Thill <nico@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 44398
*	license info - revert r43155	John Crispin	2014-11-03	1	-3/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info. Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 43167
*	Add more license tags with SPDX identifiers	John Crispin	2014-11-03	1	-0/+3
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied together - each with different licensing information in the file headers. I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license in my opinion. However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information and/or did not miss license information. Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de> SVN-Revision: 43155
*	Add a few SPDX tags	Steven Barth	2014-11-02	1	-0/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org> SVN-Revision: 43151
*	oprofile: update to 0.9.9, fix compile error	Felix Fietkau	2014-06-06	4	-76/+33
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 41035
*	move a few development packages to trunk and add myself as a maintainer	Felix Fietkau	2012-10-10	3	-0/+175
	SVN-Revision: 33705