aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/package/boot/rbcfg
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* packages: mark packages depending on a target as nonsharedMathias Kresin2017-01-241-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | The packages can't be build as shared packages due to the unmet dependencies. Fixes FS#418. Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin <dev@kresin.me>
* rbcfg: move to Boot Loaders submenu of UtilitiesAlberto Bursi2016-10-261-0/+1
| | | | | | Boot Loaders submenu of Utilities is the most logical place to find rbcfg and other bootloader tools. Signed-off-by: Alberto Bursi <alberto.bursi@outlook.it>
* boot/rbcfg: drop Build/Prepare rule in favor of default oneAlexandru Ardelean2016-10-151-5/+0
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
* license info - revert r43155John Crispin2014-11-031-3/+0
| | | | | | | | turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info. Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 43167
* Add more license tags with SPDX identifiersJohn Crispin2014-11-031-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied together - each with different licensing information in the file headers. I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license in my opinion. However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information and/or did not miss license information. Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de> SVN-Revision: 43155
* rbcfg: fix format string bugFelix Fietkau2014-06-301-1/+1
| | | | | | Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER <etienne.champetier@free.fr> SVN-Revision: 41410
* move to boot/ folderJohn Crispin2012-10-176-0/+1210
SVN-Revision: 33824