1 files changed, 0 insertions, 74 deletions
diff --git a/toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch b/toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 36e82f56dd..0000000000
--- a/toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,74 +0,0 @@
-http://bugs.gentoo.org/392645
-http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470
-
-2011-12-03  Alan Modra  <amodra@gmail.com>
-
-	PR ld/13470
-	* elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive
-	change in 2011-07-01 commit.  Comment.
-	* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise.
-
-===================================================================
-RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf32-ppc.c,v
-retrieving revision 1.302.2.1
-retrieving revision 1.302.2.2
---- a/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
-+++ b/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
-@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@ ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct bfd
-   edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
-   edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed;
- 
--  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
--  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
--    return;
--
-   if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
-     {
-       if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL)
-@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@ ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct bfd
-       eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
-     }
- 
-+  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
-+     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
-+     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
-+     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
-+     code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
-+     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
-+     DIR sym here.  */
-+  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
-+    return;
-+
-   /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to
-      the symbol which just became indirect.  */
-   edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount;
---- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-+++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@ ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct b
-   edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak;
-   edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
- 
--  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
--  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
--    return;
--
-   /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym.  */
-   if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
-     {
-@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@ ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct b
-       eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
-     }
- 
-+  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
-+     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
-+     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
-+     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
-+     code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
-+     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
-+     DIR sym here.  */
-+  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
-+    return;
-+
-   /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the
-      symbol which just became indirect.  */
-   if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL)