aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux')
-rw-r--r--target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/790-v5.7-net-switchdev-do-not-propagate-bridge-updates-across.patch60
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/790-v5.7-net-switchdev-do-not-propagate-bridge-updates-across.patch b/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/790-v5.7-net-switchdev-do-not-propagate-bridge-updates-across.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..bc8014b772
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/790-v5.7-net-switchdev-do-not-propagate-bridge-updates-across.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+From 07c6f9805f12f1bb538ef165a092b300350384aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
+Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:14:21 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] net: switchdev: do not propagate bridge updates across
+ bridges
+
+When configuring a tree of independent bridges, propagating changes
+from the upper bridge across a bridge master to the lower bridge
+ports brings surprises.
+
+For example, a lower bridge may have vlan filtering enabled. It
+may have a vlan interface attached to the bridge master, which may
+then be incorporated into another bridge. As soon as the lower
+bridge vlan interface is attached to the upper bridge, the lower
+bridge has vlan filtering disabled.
+
+This occurs because switchdev recursively applies its changes to
+all lower devices no matter what.
+
+Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
+Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
+Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
+Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
+---
+ net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 9 +++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
++++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
+@@ -476,6 +476,9 @@ static int __switchdev_handle_port_obj_a
+ * necessary to go through this helper.
+ */
+ netdev_for_each_lower_dev(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
++ if (netif_is_bridge_master(lower_dev))
++ continue;
++
+ err = __switchdev_handle_port_obj_add(lower_dev, port_obj_info,
+ check_cb, add_cb);
+ if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+@@ -528,6 +531,9 @@ static int __switchdev_handle_port_obj_d
+ * necessary to go through this helper.
+ */
+ netdev_for_each_lower_dev(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
++ if (netif_is_bridge_master(lower_dev))
++ continue;
++
+ err = __switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(lower_dev, port_obj_info,
+ check_cb, del_cb);
+ if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+@@ -579,6 +585,9 @@ static int __switchdev_handle_port_attr_
+ * necessary to go through this helper.
+ */
+ netdev_for_each_lower_dev(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
++ if (netif_is_bridge_master(lower_dev))
++ continue;
++
+ err = __switchdev_handle_port_attr_set(lower_dev, port_attr_info,
+ check_cb, set_cb);
+ if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)