diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.24/1199-fix-pcf50633-disable-irq-from-suspend-until-resume.p.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.24/1199-fix-pcf50633-disable-irq-from-suspend-until-resume.p.patch | 236 |
1 files changed, 236 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.24/1199-fix-pcf50633-disable-irq-from-suspend-until-resume.p.patch b/target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.24/1199-fix-pcf50633-disable-irq-from-suspend-until-resume.p.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a6ca94e2f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.24/1199-fix-pcf50633-disable-irq-from-suspend-until-resume.p.patch @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@ +From eaa55efc0b559abebbcf2acea6ce267cea4c26f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Andy Green <andy@openmoko.com> +Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 22:41:52 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH] fix-pcf50633-disable-irq-from-suspend-until-resume.patch + +Disable pcf interrupt (not for wake, just as interrupt) in +suspend, re-enable it again just before we force-call the +workqueue function at end of pcf resume, which leads to +pcf interrupt source registers getting cleared so it can +signal an interrupt normally again. + +This change ends the uncontrolled appearance of pcf interrupts +during resume time which previously caused the work to attempt +to use the I2C stuff before i2c host device had itself resumed. +Now the isr work is only queued, and the isr work function called, +definitively after pcf resume completes. + +In suspend time, the work function may have been queued some +time before and be pending, and it could still show up at a +bad time. Therefore if the work function sees that it is +coming since the start of pcf50633 suspend function, it +aborts without attempting to read the pcf interrupt regs, +leaving them for resume to take care of. + +USB current limit and no battery work functions are also made +aware of suspend state and act accordingly. + +Lastly I noticed that in early resume, i2c_get_clientdata(&pcf->client) +returns NULL, presumably because i2c device is still suspended. This +could easily make trouble for async events like interrupt work, +since pcf pointer is the client data. Disabling appearance of the +work until after pcf50633 resume will also avoid that. + +Signed-off-by: Andy Green <andy@openmoko.com> +--- + drivers/i2c/chips/pcf50633.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- + 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/drivers/i2c/chips/pcf50633.c b/drivers/i2c/chips/pcf50633.c +index c014384..120fdbc 100644 +--- a/drivers/i2c/chips/pcf50633.c ++++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/pcf50633.c +@@ -632,6 +632,11 @@ static void pcf50633_work_usbcurlim(struct work_struct *work) + + mutex_lock(&pcf->working_lock_usb_curlimit); + ++ /* just can't cope with it if we are suspending, don't reschedule */ ++ if ((pcf->suspend_state == PCF50633_SS_STARTING_SUSPEND) || ++ (pcf->suspend_state == PCF50633_SS_COMPLETED_SUSPEND)) ++ goto bail; ++ + dev_info(&pcf->client.dev, "pcf50633_work_usbcurlim\n"); + + if (!pcf->probe_completed) +@@ -663,7 +668,8 @@ bail: + reschedule: + dev_info(&pcf->client.dev, "pcf50633_work_usbcurlim rescheduling\n"); + if (!schedule_work(&pcf->work_usb_curlimit)) +- dev_err(&pcf->client.dev, "work item may be lost\n"); ++ dev_err(&pcf->client.dev, "curlim reschedule work " ++ "already queued\n"); + + mutex_unlock(&pcf->working_lock_usb_curlimit); + /* don't spew, delaying whatever else is happening */ +@@ -700,7 +706,7 @@ int pcf50633_notify_usb_current_limit_change(struct pcf50633_data *pcf, + pcf->pending_curlimit = ma; + + if (!schedule_work(&pcf->work_usb_curlimit)) +- dev_err(&pcf->client.dev, "work item may be lost\n"); ++ dev_err(&pcf->client.dev, "curlim work item already queued\n"); + + return 0; + } +@@ -727,6 +733,9 @@ static void pcf50633_work_nobat(struct work_struct *work) + while (1) { + msleep(1000); + ++ if (pcf->suspend_state != PCF50633_SS_RUNNING) ++ continue; ++ + /* there's a battery in there now? */ + if (reg_read(pcf, PCF50633_REG_MBCS3) & 0x40) { + +@@ -761,6 +770,10 @@ static void pcf50633_work(struct work_struct *work) + mutex_lock(&pcf->working_lock); + pcf->working = 1; + ++ /* sanity */ ++ if (!&pcf->client.dev) ++ goto bail; ++ + /* + * if we are presently suspending, we are not in a position to deal + * with pcf50633 interrupts at all. +@@ -784,42 +797,55 @@ static void pcf50633_work(struct work_struct *work) + * reloaded with their pre-suspend states yet. Therefore we will + * defer our service if we are called like that until our resume has + * completed. ++ * ++ * This shouldn't happen any more because we disable servicing this ++ * interrupt in suspend and don't re-enable it until resume is ++ * completed. + */ + +- if (pcf->have_been_suspended && (pcf->have_been_suspended < 3)) ++ if (pcf->suspend_state && ++ (pcf->suspend_state != PCF50633_SS_COMPLETED_RESUME)) ++ goto reschedule; ++ ++ /* this is the case early in resume! Sanity check! */ ++ if (i2c_get_clientdata(&pcf->client) == NULL) + goto reschedule; + + /* +- * datasheet says we have to read the five IRQ +- * status regs in one transaction +- */ +- ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(&pcf->client, PCF50633_REG_INT1, 5, +- pcfirq); +- if (ret != 5) { ++ * datasheet says we have to read the five IRQ ++ * status regs in one transaction ++ */ ++ ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(&pcf->client, ++ PCF50633_REG_INT1, ++ sizeof(pcfirq), ++ pcfirq); ++ if (ret != sizeof(pcfirq)) { + dev_info(&pcf->client.dev, +- "Oh crap PMU IRQ register read failed -- " +- "retrying later %d\n", ret); ++ "Oh crap PMU IRQ register read failed -- " ++ "retrying later %d\n", ret); + /* +- * it shouldn't fail, we no longer attempt to use I2C while +- * it can be suspended. But we don't have much option but to +- * retry if if it ever did fail, because if we don't service +- * the interrupt to clear it, we will never see another PMU +- * interrupt edge. ++ * it shouldn't fail, we no longer attempt to use ++ * I2C while it can be suspended. But we don't have ++ * much option but to retry if if it ever did fail, ++ * because if we don't service the interrupt to clear ++ * it, we will never see another PMU interrupt edge. + */ + goto reschedule; + } + +- /* hey did we just resume? */ +- +- if (pcf->have_been_suspended) { +- /* resume is officially over now then */ +- pcf->have_been_suspended = 0; ++ /* hey did we just resume? (because we don't get here unless we are ++ * running normally or the first call after resumption) ++ */ + ++ if (pcf->suspend_state != PCF50633_SS_RUNNING) { + /* +- * grab a copy of resume interrupt reasons +- * from pcf50633 POV +- */ ++ * grab a copy of resume interrupt reasons ++ * from pcf50633 POV ++ */ + memcpy(pcf->pcfirq_resume, pcfirq, sizeof(pcf->pcfirq_resume)); ++ ++ /* pcf50633 resume is really really over now then */ ++ pcf->suspend_state = PCF50633_SS_RUNNING; + } + + if (!pcf->coldplug_done) { +@@ -1169,6 +1195,7 @@ static void pcf50633_work(struct work_struct *work) + + DEBUGPC("\n"); + ++bail: + pcf->working = 0; + input_sync(pcf->input_dev); + put_device(&pcf->client.dev); +@@ -1202,7 +1229,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pcf50633_irq(int irq, void *_pcf) + + get_device(&pcf->client.dev); + if (!schedule_work(&pcf->work) && !pcf->working) +- dev_err(&pcf->client.dev, "work item may be lost\n"); ++ dev_err(&pcf->client.dev, "pcf irq work already queued\n"); + + return IRQ_HANDLED; + } +@@ -2310,7 +2337,7 @@ int pcf50633_report_resumers(struct pcf50633_data *pcf, char *buf) + char *end = buf; + int n; + +- for (n = 0; n < 40; n++) ++ for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(int_names); n++) + if (int_names[n]) { + if (pcf->pcfirq_resume[n >> 3] & (1 >> (n & 7))) + end += sprintf(end, " * %s\n", int_names[n]); +@@ -2359,6 +2386,15 @@ static int pcf50633_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state) + + mutex_lock(&pcf->lock); + ++ pcf->suspend_state = PCF50633_SS_STARTING_SUSPEND; ++ ++ /* we are not going to service any further interrupts until we ++ * resume. If the IRQ workqueue is still pending in the background, ++ * it will bail when it sees we set suspend state above ++ */ ++ ++ disable_irq(pcf->irq); ++ + /* Save all registers that don't "survive" standby state */ + pcf->standby_regs.ooctim2 = __reg_read(pcf, PCF50633_REG_OOCTIM2); + +@@ -2502,6 +2538,8 @@ static int pcf50633_resume(struct device *dev) + + pcf->suspend_state = PCF50633_SS_COMPLETED_RESUME; + ++ enable_irq(pcf->irq); ++ + mutex_unlock(&pcf->lock); + + /* gratuitous call to PCF work function, in the case that the PCF +@@ -2511,8 +2549,7 @@ static int pcf50633_resume(struct device *dev) + */ + + get_device(&pcf->client.dev); +- if (!schedule_work(&pcf->work) && !pcf->working) +- dev_err(&pcf->client.dev, "resume work item may be lost\n"); ++ pcf50633_work(&pcf->work); + + callback_all_resume_dependencies(&pcf->resume_dependency); + +-- +1.5.6.5 + |