aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.4/047-net-mvneta-Fix-spinlock-usage.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.4/047-net-mvneta-Fix-spinlock-usage.patch')
-rw-r--r--target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.4/047-net-mvneta-Fix-spinlock-usage.patch52
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.4/047-net-mvneta-Fix-spinlock-usage.patch b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.4/047-net-mvneta-Fix-spinlock-usage.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a8e78df2e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.4/047-net-mvneta-Fix-spinlock-usage.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
+Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:44:17 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] net: mvneta: Fix spinlock usage
+
+In the previous patch, the spinlock was not initialized. While it didn't
+cause any trouble yet it could be a problem to use it uninitialized.
+
+The most annoying part was the critical section protected by the spinlock
+in mvneta_stop(). Some of the functions could sleep as pointed when
+activated CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP. Actually, in mvneta_stop() we only
+need to protect the is_stopped flagged, indeed the code of the notifier
+for CPU online is protected by the same spinlock, so when we get the
+lock, the notifer work is done.
+
+Reported-by: Patrick Uiterwijk <patrick@puiterwijk.org>
+Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
+Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
+---
+
+--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
++++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+@@ -3484,17 +3484,17 @@ static int mvneta_stop(struct net_device
+ struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
+
+ /* Inform that we are stopping so we don't want to setup the
+- * driver for new CPUs in the notifiers
++ * driver for new CPUs in the notifiers. The code of the
++ * notifier for CPU online is protected by the same spinlock,
++ * so when we get the lock, the notifer work is done.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&pp->lock);
+ pp->is_stopped = true;
++ spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
++
+ mvneta_stop_dev(pp);
+ mvneta_mdio_remove(pp);
+ unregister_cpu_notifier(&pp->cpu_notifier);
+- /* Now that the notifier are unregistered, we can release le
+- * lock
+- */
+- spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
+ on_each_cpu(mvneta_percpu_disable, pp, true);
+ free_percpu_irq(dev->irq, pp->ports);
+ mvneta_cleanup_rxqs(pp);
+@@ -4027,6 +4027,7 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_
+ dev->ethtool_ops = &mvneta_eth_tool_ops;
+
+ pp = netdev_priv(dev);
++ spin_lock_init(&pp->lock);
+ pp->phy_node = phy_node;
+ pp->phy_interface = phy_mode;
+