diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0108-sdk_dpaa-ls1043a-errata-impose-S-G-frame-realignment.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0108-sdk_dpaa-ls1043a-errata-impose-S-G-frame-realignment.patch | 81 |
1 files changed, 81 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0108-sdk_dpaa-ls1043a-errata-impose-S-G-frame-realignment.patch b/target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0108-sdk_dpaa-ls1043a-errata-impose-S-G-frame-realignment.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8de280212f --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0108-sdk_dpaa-ls1043a-errata-impose-S-G-frame-realignment.patch @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +From bfc02cc199dc6259c2f4e2af8f77c88fe8ba4cc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@nxp.com> +Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 11:55:54 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] sdk_dpaa: ls1043a errata: impose S/G frame realignment + +Scatter/Gather frames are not support on LS1043A beacuse they trigger +the A010022 errata. + +Even though we do not advertise S/G support to the stack, we need to +make sure that if S/G frames do reach the driver somehow, they trigger +the errata workaround. + +Signed-off-by: Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@nxp.com> +--- + drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/sdk_dpaa/dpaa_eth.h | 7 ++++--- + .../net/ethernet/freescale/sdk_dpaa/dpaa_eth_sg.c | 23 +++++----------------- + 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) + +--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/sdk_dpaa/dpaa_eth.h ++++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/sdk_dpaa/dpaa_eth.h +@@ -653,9 +653,10 @@ static inline void _dpa_bp_free_pf(void + + /* LS1043A SoC has a HW issue regarding FMan DMA transactions; The issue + * manifests itself at high traffic rates when frames cross 4K memory +- * boundaries or when they are not aligned to 16 bytes; For the moment, we +- * use a SW workaround that realigns frames to 256 bytes. Scatter/Gather +- * frames aren't supported on egress. ++ * boundaries, when they are not aligned to 16 bytes or when they have ++ * Scatter/Gather fragments; For the moment, we use a SW workaround that ++ * realigns frames to 256 bytes. Scatter/Gather frames aren't supported ++ * on egress. + */ + + #ifndef CONFIG_PPC +--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/sdk_dpaa/dpaa_eth_sg.c ++++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/sdk_dpaa/dpaa_eth_sg.c +@@ -772,18 +772,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_to_contig_fd); + + #ifndef CONFIG_PPC + /* Verify the conditions that trigger the A010022 errata: data unaligned to +- * 16 bytes and 4K memory address crossings. ++ * 16 bytes, 4K memory address crossings and S/G fragments. + */ + static bool a010022_check_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct dpa_priv_s *priv) + { +- int nr_frags, i = 0; +- skb_frag_t *frag; +- + /* Check if the headroom is aligned */ + if (((uintptr_t)skb->data - priv->tx_headroom) % + priv->buf_layout[TX].data_align != 0) + return true; + ++ /* Check for paged data in the skb. We do not support S/G fragments */ ++ if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) ++ return true; ++ + /* Check if the headroom crosses a boundary */ + if (HAS_DMA_ISSUE(skb->head, skb_headroom(skb))) + return true; +@@ -796,20 +797,6 @@ static bool a010022_check_skb(struct sk_ + if (HAS_DMA_ISSUE(skb->head, skb_end_offset(skb))) + return true; + +- nr_frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; +- +- while (i < nr_frags) { +- frag = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i]; +- +- /* Check if a paged fragment crosses a boundary from its +- * offset to its end. +- */ +- if (HAS_DMA_ISSUE(frag->page_offset, frag->size)) +- return true; +- +- i++; +- } +- + return false; + } + |