aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0057-sdk_fman-fix-probing-of-10G-ports-on-T102x.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0057-sdk_fman-fix-probing-of-10G-ports-on-T102x.patch')
-rw-r--r--target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0057-sdk_fman-fix-probing-of-10G-ports-on-T102x.patch87
1 files changed, 87 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0057-sdk_fman-fix-probing-of-10G-ports-on-T102x.patch b/target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0057-sdk_fman-fix-probing-of-10G-ports-on-T102x.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e772c95977
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0057-sdk_fman-fix-probing-of-10G-ports-on-T102x.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+From 7dd27606d9b7f28a7367e4b9444bed7d573f4b6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@nxp.com>
+Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:33:19 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] sdk_fman: fix probing of 10G ports on T102x
+
+Signed-off-by: Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@nxp.com>
+---
+ .../sdk_fman/src/wrapper/lnxwrp_fm_port.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-----
+ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/sdk_fman/src/wrapper/lnxwrp_fm_port.c
++++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/sdk_fman/src/wrapper/lnxwrp_fm_port.c
+@@ -388,7 +388,14 @@ static t_LnxWrpFmPortDev *ReadFmPortDevT
+ settings.param.specificParams.nonRxParams.qmChannel =
+ p_LnxWrpFmPortDev->txCh;
+ } else if (of_device_is_compatible(port_node, "fsl,fman-port-10g-tx")) {
++#ifndef CONFIG_FMAN_ARM
++ /* On T102x, the 10G TX port IDs start from 0x28 */
++ if (IS_T1023_T1024)
++ tmp_prop -= 0x28;
++ else
++#endif
+ tmp_prop -= 0x30;
++
+ if (unlikely(tmp_prop>= FM_MAX_NUM_OF_10G_TX_PORTS)) {
+ REPORT_ERROR(MAJOR, E_INVALID_VALUE,
+ ("of_get_property(%s, cell-index) failed",
+@@ -399,7 +406,7 @@ static t_LnxWrpFmPortDev *ReadFmPortDevT
+ FM_MAX_NUM_OF_1G_TX_PORTS];
+ #ifndef CONFIG_FMAN_ARM
+ if (IS_T1023_T1024)
+- p_LnxWrpFmPortDev = &p_LnxWrpFmDev->txPorts[*uint32_prop];
++ p_LnxWrpFmPortDev = &p_LnxWrpFmDev->txPorts[tmp_prop];
+ #endif
+
+ p_LnxWrpFmPortDev->id = tmp_prop;
+@@ -437,7 +444,14 @@ static t_LnxWrpFmPortDev *ReadFmPortDevT
+ if (p_LnxWrpFmDev->pcdActive)
+ p_LnxWrpFmPortDev->defPcd = p_LnxWrpFmDev->defPcd;
+ } else if (of_device_is_compatible(port_node, "fsl,fman-port-10g-rx")) {
++#ifndef CONFIG_FMAN_ARM
++ /* On T102x, the 10G RX port IDs start from 0x08 */
++ if (IS_T1023_T1024)
++ tmp_prop -= 0x8;
++ else
++#endif
+ tmp_prop -= 0x10;
++
+ if (unlikely(tmp_prop >= FM_MAX_NUM_OF_10G_RX_PORTS)) {
+ REPORT_ERROR(MAJOR, E_INVALID_VALUE,
+ ("of_get_property(%s, cell-index) failed",
+@@ -449,7 +463,7 @@ static t_LnxWrpFmPortDev *ReadFmPortDevT
+
+ #ifndef CONFIG_FMAN_ARM
+ if (IS_T1023_T1024)
+- p_LnxWrpFmPortDev = &p_LnxWrpFmDev->rxPorts[*uint32_prop];
++ p_LnxWrpFmPortDev = &p_LnxWrpFmDev->rxPorts[tmp_prop];
+ #endif
+
+ p_LnxWrpFmPortDev->id = tmp_prop;
+@@ -637,7 +651,7 @@ static t_Error CheckNConfigFmPortAdvArgs
+ uint32_prop = (uint32_t *)of_get_property(port_node, "ar-tables-sizes",
+ &lenp);
+ if (uint32_prop) {
+-
++
+ if (WARN_ON(lenp != sizeof(uint32_t)*8))
+ RETURN_ERROR(MINOR, E_INVALID_VALUE, NO_MSG);
+ if (WARN_ON(p_LnxWrpFmPortDev->settings.param.portType !=
+@@ -671,7 +685,7 @@ static t_Error CheckNConfigFmPortAdvArgs
+ if (uint32_prop) {
+ if (WARN_ON(lenp != sizeof(uint32_t)*3))
+ RETURN_ERROR(MINOR, E_INVALID_VALUE, NO_MSG);
+-
++
+ p_LnxWrpFmPortDev->dsar_table_sizes.max_num_of_ip_prot_filtering =
+ (uint16_t)be32_to_cpu(uint32_prop[0]);
+ p_LnxWrpFmPortDev->dsar_table_sizes.max_num_of_tcp_port_filtering =
+@@ -679,7 +693,7 @@ static t_Error CheckNConfigFmPortAdvArgs
+ p_LnxWrpFmPortDev->dsar_table_sizes.max_num_of_udp_port_filtering =
+ (uint16_t)be32_to_cpu(uint32_prop[2]);
+ }
+-
++
+ if ((err = FM_PORT_ConfigDsarSupport(p_LnxWrpFmPortDev->h_Dev,
+ (t_FmPortDsarTablesSizes*)&p_LnxWrpFmPortDev->dsar_table_sizes)) != E_OK)
+ RETURN_ERROR(MINOR, err, NO_MSG);