diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0117-wireguard-avoid-double-unlikely-notation-when-using-.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0117-wireguard-avoid-double-unlikely-notation-when-using-.patch | 55 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 55 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0117-wireguard-avoid-double-unlikely-notation-when-using-.patch b/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0117-wireguard-avoid-double-unlikely-notation-when-using-.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 7dfc1bb919..0000000000 --- a/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0117-wireguard-avoid-double-unlikely-notation-when-using-.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,55 +0,0 @@ -From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Antonio Quartulli <a@unstable.cc> -Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:25:43 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] wireguard: avoid double unlikely() notation when using - IS_ERR() - -commit 30ac4e2f54ec067b7b9ca0db27e75681581378d6 upstream. - -The definition of IS_ERR() already applies the unlikely() notation -when checking the error status of the passed pointer. For this -reason there is no need to have the same notation outside of -IS_ERR() itself. - -Clean up code by removing redundant notation. - -Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <a@unstable.cc> -Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> -Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> -Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> ---- - drivers/net/wireguard/device.c | 2 +- - drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c | 4 ++-- - 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) - ---- a/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c -+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c -@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t wg_xmit(struct sk_buf - } else { - struct sk_buff *segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, 0); - -- if (unlikely(IS_ERR(segs))) { -+ if (IS_ERR(segs)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(segs); - goto err_peer; - } ---- a/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c -+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c -@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int send4(struct wg_device *wg, s - ip_rt_put(rt); - rt = ip_route_output_flow(sock_net(sock), &fl, sock); - } -- if (unlikely(IS_ERR(rt))) { -+ if (IS_ERR(rt)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(rt); - net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: No route to %pISpfsc, error %d\n", - wg->dev->name, &endpoint->addr, ret); -@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int send6(struct wg_device *wg, s - } - dst = ipv6_stub->ipv6_dst_lookup_flow(sock_net(sock), sock, &fl, - NULL); -- if (unlikely(IS_ERR(dst))) { -+ if (IS_ERR(dst)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(dst); - net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: No route to %pISpfsc, error %d\n", - wg->dev->name, &endpoint->addr, ret); |