aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/generic/backport-4.14/366-netfilter-nft_flow_offload-Fix-reverse-route-lookup.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/generic/backport-4.14/366-netfilter-nft_flow_offload-Fix-reverse-route-lookup.patch')
-rw-r--r--target/linux/generic/backport-4.14/366-netfilter-nft_flow_offload-Fix-reverse-route-lookup.patch39
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/generic/backport-4.14/366-netfilter-nft_flow_offload-Fix-reverse-route-lookup.patch b/target/linux/generic/backport-4.14/366-netfilter-nft_flow_offload-Fix-reverse-route-lookup.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e91aaa91d7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/generic/backport-4.14/366-netfilter-nft_flow_offload-Fix-reverse-route-lookup.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
+Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:40:11 +0800
+Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: nft_flow_offload: Fix reverse route lookup
+
+Using the following example:
+
+ client 1.1.1.7 ---> 2.2.2.7 which dnat to 10.0.0.7 server
+
+The first reply packet (ie. syn+ack) uses an incorrect destination
+address for the reverse route lookup since it uses:
+
+ daddr = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3.ip;
+
+which is 2.2.2.7 in the scenario that is described above, while this
+should be:
+
+ daddr = ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u3.ip;
+
+that is 10.0.0.7.
+
+Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
+Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
+---
+
+--- a/net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c
++++ b/net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c
+@@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ static int nft_flow_route(const struct n
+ memset(&fl, 0, sizeof(fl));
+ switch (nft_pf(pkt)) {
+ case NFPROTO_IPV4:
+- fl.u.ip4.daddr = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3.ip;
++ fl.u.ip4.daddr = ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u3.ip;
+ break;
+ case NFPROTO_IPV6:
+- fl.u.ip6.daddr = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3.in6;
++ fl.u.ip6.daddr = ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u3.in6;
+ break;
+ }
+