diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.10/033-v5.16-0016-ARM-dts-NSP-Fix-MX64-MX65-eeprom-node-name.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.10/033-v5.16-0016-ARM-dts-NSP-Fix-MX64-MX65-eeprom-node-name.patch | 28 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.10/033-v5.16-0016-ARM-dts-NSP-Fix-MX64-MX65-eeprom-node-name.patch b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.10/033-v5.16-0016-ARM-dts-NSP-Fix-MX64-MX65-eeprom-node-name.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..4cffad1f4e --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.10/033-v5.16-0016-ARM-dts-NSP-Fix-MX64-MX65-eeprom-node-name.patch @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +From 56e4e548427240d85fd220460d0ab5987e1dec00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Matthew Hagan <mnhagan88@gmail.com> +Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 22:37:50 +0000 +Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: NSP: Fix MX64/MX65 eeprom node name + +Running dtbs_check yields the following message when checking the +MX64/MX65 devicetree: +at24@50: $nodename:0: 'at24@50' does not match '^eeprom@[0-9a-f]{1,2}$' + +This patch fixes the issue by renaming the at24 node appropriately. + +Signed-off-by: Matthew Hagan <mnhagan88@gmail.com> +Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> +--- + arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx6x-common.dtsi | 2 +- + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) + +--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx6x-common.dtsi ++++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx6x-common.dtsi +@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ + &i2c0 { + status = "okay"; + +- at24@50 { ++ eeprom@50 { + compatible = "atmel,24c64"; + reg = <0x50>; + pagesize = <32>; |