diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.9/400-mtd-spi-nor-detect-JEDEC-incompatible-w25q128-using-.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.9/400-mtd-spi-nor-detect-JEDEC-incompatible-w25q128-using-.patch | 34 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.9/400-mtd-spi-nor-detect-JEDEC-incompatible-w25q128-using-.patch b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.9/400-mtd-spi-nor-detect-JEDEC-incompatible-w25q128-using-.patch deleted file mode 100644 index caed9ec41d..0000000000 --- a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.9/400-mtd-spi-nor-detect-JEDEC-incompatible-w25q128-using-.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,34 +0,0 @@ -From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <zajec5@gmail.com> -Subject: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: detect JEDEC incompatible w25q128 using 0x90 - command -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - -Some w25q128 chipsets don't support RDID (0x9f) command, they reply with -0xff-s only. To suppose such flashes fallback to the 0x90 command. - -Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> ---- - ---- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c -+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c -@@ -1194,6 +1194,18 @@ static const struct flash_info *spi_nor_ - } - dev_err(nor->dev, "unrecognized JEDEC id bytes: %02x, %02x, %02x\n", - id[0], id[1], id[2]); -+ -+ tmp = nor->read_reg(nor, 0x90, id, SPI_NOR_MAX_ID_LEN); -+ if (tmp < 0) { -+ dev_dbg(nor->dev, " error %d reading JEDEC ID\n", tmp); -+ return ERR_PTR(tmp); -+ } -+ dev_info(nor->dev, "using Read Manufacturer / Device ID command (0x%02x) returned %02x %02x\n", -+ 0x90, id[0x03], id[0x04]); -+ if (id[0x03] == 0xef && id[0x04] == 0x17) { -+ return spi_nor_match_id("w25q128"); -+ } -+ - return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); - } - |