1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.10/950-0404-overlays-Add-missing-addresses-to-ads1015-ads1115.patch b/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.10/950-0404-overlays-Add-missing-addresses-to-ads1015-ads1115.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..346c1017e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.10/950-0404-overlays-Add-missing-addresses-to-ads1015-ads1115.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+From f3f0143ace6866e7370e1cec6ff04f0e6ede11dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
+Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 09:28:17 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] overlays: Add missing addresses to ads1015/ads1115
+
+The overlays for the ads1015 and ads1115 I2C ADCs omitted the addresses
+in the main device node names. As well as breaking the conventions for
+I2C devices, this prevents the firmware from renaming them when the
+"reg" property is modified, which in turn stops the overlays from being
+instantiated multiple times.
+
+See: https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=107&t=294465
+
+Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
+---
+ arch/arm/boot/dts/overlays/ads1015-overlay.dts | 2 +-
+ arch/arm/boot/dts/overlays/ads1115-overlay.dts | 2 +-
+ 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/overlays/ads1015-overlay.dts
++++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/overlays/ads1015-overlay.dts
+@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
+             #address-cells = <1>;
+             #size-cells = <0>;
+             status = "okay";
+-            ads1015: ads1015 {
++            ads1015: ads1015@48 {
+                 compatible = "ti,ads1015";
+                 status = "okay";
+                 #address-cells = <1>;
+--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/overlays/ads1115-overlay.dts
++++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/overlays/ads1115-overlay.dts
+@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
+ 			#size-cells = <0>;
+ 			status = "okay";
+ 
+-			ads1115: ads1115 {
++			ads1115: ads1115@48 {
+ 				compatible = "ti,ads1115";
+ 				status = "okay";
+ 				#address-cells = <1>;