diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/at91/patches-5.10/130-regulator-mcp16502-lpm-pin-can-be-optional-on-some-p.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | target/linux/at91/patches-5.10/130-regulator-mcp16502-lpm-pin-can-be-optional-on-some-p.patch | 30 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/at91/patches-5.10/130-regulator-mcp16502-lpm-pin-can-be-optional-on-some-p.patch b/target/linux/at91/patches-5.10/130-regulator-mcp16502-lpm-pin-can-be-optional-on-some-p.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 12679a20bd..0000000000 --- a/target/linux/at91/patches-5.10/130-regulator-mcp16502-lpm-pin-can-be-optional-on-some-p.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,30 +0,0 @@ -From 763fe72f607d4e929d2c710c88e5c6978dd6ad97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> -Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 16:15:26 +0200 -Subject: [PATCH 130/247] regulator: mcp16502: lpm pin can be optional on some - platforms - -On some platform (e.g. SAMA7G5) LPM pin should be optional as it can -be controlled explicitly (via shutdown controller registers) in the -platform specific power saving code to decrease the power consumption -while suspended as this SoC pin may be connected to other devices that -could take power saving actions based on its value. - -Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> -Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1610028927-9842-3-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com -Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> ---- - drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c | 2 +- - 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) - ---- a/drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c -+++ b/drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c -@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int mcp16502_probe(struct i2c_cli - config.regmap = rmap; - config.driver_data = mcp; - -- mcp->lpm = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "lpm", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); -+ mcp->lpm = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "lpm", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); - if (IS_ERR(mcp->lpm)) { - dev_err(dev, "failed to get lpm pin: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(mcp->lpm)); - return PTR_ERR(mcp->lpm); |