diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/007-hso-Earlier-catch-of-error-condition.patch | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/008-hso-Fix-stack-corruption-on-some-architectures.patch | 4 |
2 files changed, 6 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/007-hso-Earlier-catch-of-error-condition.patch b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/007-hso-Earlier-catch-of-error-condition.patch index 4eb31b31aa..04866edbcd 100644 --- a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/007-hso-Earlier-catch-of-error-condition.patch +++ b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/007-hso-Earlier-catch-of-error-condition.patch @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ From 35e57e1b49a351aa804dab6010cd46ae6112a541 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Gimpelevich <daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:43:07 -0700 -Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hso: Earlier catch of error condition +Subject: [PATCH] hso: Earlier catch of error condition + +commit 35e57e1b49a351aa804dab6010cd46ae6112a541 upstream. There is no need to get an interface specification if we know it's the wrong one. diff --git a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/008-hso-Fix-stack-corruption-on-some-architectures.patch b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/008-hso-Fix-stack-corruption-on-some-architectures.patch index 067e7f85ba..e44f713d63 100644 --- a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/008-hso-Fix-stack-corruption-on-some-architectures.patch +++ b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/008-hso-Fix-stack-corruption-on-some-architectures.patch @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ From e75dc677ff8d06ffa61bef6fee436227ae5440c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Gimpelevich <daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:43:19 -0700 -Subject: [PATCH 2/2] hso: Fix stack corruption on some architectures +Subject: [PATCH] hso: Fix stack corruption on some architectures + +commit e75dc677ff8d06ffa61bef6fee436227ae5440c6 upstream. As Sergei Shtylyov explained in the #mipslinux IRC channel: [Mon 2013-08-19 12:28:21 PM PDT] <headless> guys, are you sure it's not "DMA off stack" case? |