diff options
| author | Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com> | 2021-10-24 02:45:25 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com> | 2021-10-24 11:20:22 +0200 |
| commit | 36104dc51f5a4fef961b97aaaa8dfe753dfb5e04 (patch) | |
| tree | 376e9c0a8fd1a3efc23bb8852dce410fe53d2585 /target | |
| parent | cb11eaf5dd2f443f46f1f73109a16c15551c2f3a (diff) | |
| download | upstream-36104dc51f5a4fef961b97aaaa8dfe753dfb5e04.tar.gz upstream-36104dc51f5a4fef961b97aaaa8dfe753dfb5e04.tar.bz2 upstream-36104dc51f5a4fef961b97aaaa8dfe753dfb5e04.zip | |
kernel: 5.10: silence bogus "Missing #address-cells in interrupt provider" warnings
Rosen reported strange dtc warnings that had their origin in
an upstream patch to 5.8-rc1. Upon further digging this
revealed an ongoing thread [0] discussing the topic:
> [...]I don't think we need a bunch of warning fix patches to add
> these everywhere. Also, the need for #address-cells pretty much makes
> no sense on any modern system. It is a relic from days when the bus
> (address) topology and interrupt topology were related.
and later on:
> So really, we only need to be checking for #address-cells in nodes
> with interrupt-map.
This patch backports just the patch which removed the warning message
(this is from the upstream dtc project [1] - but not the kernel).
the patch does not add the checking of the #address-cells in nodes
with interrupt-map.
[0] <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/91e3405245c89f134676449cf3822285798d2ed2.1612189652.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com/>
[1] <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/dtc/dtc.git/commit/?id=d8d1a9a77863a8c7031ae82a1d461aa78eb72a7b>
Link: <https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/4685>
Reported-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'target')
| -rw-r--r-- | target/linux/generic/pending-5.10/050-dtc-checks-Drop-interrupt-provider-address-cells-check.patch | 28 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/generic/pending-5.10/050-dtc-checks-Drop-interrupt-provider-address-cells-check.patch b/target/linux/generic/pending-5.10/050-dtc-checks-Drop-interrupt-provider-address-cells-check.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..75f63728ec --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/generic/pending-5.10/050-dtc-checks-Drop-interrupt-provider-address-cells-check.patch @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +From d8d1a9a77863a8c7031ae82a1d461aa78eb72a7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> +Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:12:43 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH] checks: Drop interrupt provider '#address-cells' check + +'#address-cells' is only needed when parsing 'interrupt-map' properties, so +remove it from the common interrupt-provider test. + +Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> +Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> +Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> +Message-Id: <20211011191245.1009682-3-robh@kernel.org> +Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> +--- +--- a/scripts/dtc/checks.c ++++ b/scripts/dtc/checks.c +@@ -1569,11 +1569,6 @@ static void check_interrupt_provider(str + if (!prop) + FAIL(c, dti, node, + "Missing #interrupt-cells in interrupt provider"); +- +- prop = get_property(node, "#address-cells"); +- if (!prop) +- FAIL(c, dti, node, +- "Missing #address-cells in interrupt provider"); + } + WARNING(interrupt_provider, check_interrupt_provider, NULL); + |