ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs

The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
 * fixes wrong indentation
 * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
 * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
 * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)

Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>

SVN-Revision: 46664

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/WNCE2001.dts b/target/linux/ramips/dts/WNCE2001.dts
index bd0d596d6a..36eb473d5c 100644
--- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/WNCE2001.dts
+++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/WNCE2001.dts
@@ -86,22 +86,22 @@
 		compatible = "gpio-leds";
 
 		power-green {
-			label = "netgear:green:power";
+			label = "wnce2001:green:power";
 			gpios = <&gpio0 8 1>;
 		};
 
 		power-red {
-			label = "netgear:red:power";
+			label = "wnce2001:red:power";
 			gpios = <&gpio0 9 1>;
 		};
 
 		wlan-green {
-			label = "netgear:green:wlan";
+			label = "wnce2001:green:wlan";
 			gpios = <&gpio0 12 0>;
 		};
 
 		wlan-red {
-			label = "netgear:red:wlan";
+			label = "wnce2001:red:wlan";
 			gpios = <&gpio0 13 0>;
 		};
 	};