ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs

The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
 * fixes wrong indentation
 * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
 * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
 * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)

Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>

SVN-Revision: 46664

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/WLI-TX4-AG300N.dts b/target/linux/ramips/dts/WLI-TX4-AG300N.dts
index e7e8e4a395..3a456b8418 100644
--- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/WLI-TX4-AG300N.dts
+++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/WLI-TX4-AG300N.dts
@@ -88,17 +88,17 @@
 		compatible = "gpio-leds";
 
 		diag {
-			label = "buffalo:red:diag";
+			label = "wli-tx4-ag300n:red:diag";
 			gpios = <&gpio0 10 1>;
 		};
 
 		power {
-			label = "buffalo:blue:power";
+			label = "wli-tx4-ag300n:blue:power";
 			gpios = <&gpio0 12 1>;
 		};
 
 		security {
-			label = "buffalo:blue:security";
+			label = "wli-tx4-ag300n:blue:security";
 			gpios = <&gpio0 13 1>;
 		};
 	};