aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.19/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>2018-12-27 21:54:28 +0100
committerRafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>2018-12-27 22:12:15 +0100
commit25d8aa7d02d2919d9cae14c2c8db3fcc09420edd (patch)
tree399d9514aa419596e5913dcf98136b5046a3b657 /target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.19/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch
parent6ab138fa84c285075a787fe8ef1ed50b5cc28a85 (diff)
downloadupstream-25d8aa7d02d2919d9cae14c2c8db3fcc09420edd.tar.gz
upstream-25d8aa7d02d2919d9cae14c2c8db3fcc09420edd.tar.bz2
upstream-25d8aa7d02d2919d9cae14c2c8db3fcc09420edd.zip
brcm47xx: add support for the kernel 4.19
One patch that wasn't ported due to a lot of conflict is: 901-Revert-bcma-switch-GPIO-portions-to-use-GPIOLIB_IRQC.patch Hopefully a correct/real fix will get developed before we switch brcm47xx to the 4.14. This IS NOT ready for switching/trying/using 4.19 yet due to some DMA regression affecting bgmac: [ 0.945472] bgmac_bcma bcma0:2: Found PHY addr: 25 [ 0.954565] libphy: bcma_mdio mii bus: probed [ 0.959486] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.964387] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:516 bgmac_enet_probe+0x1b4/0x5c4 [ 0.973751] Modules linked in: [ 0.976913] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.9 #0 [ 0.982750] Stack : 804a0000 804597c4 00000000 00000000 80458fd8 8381bc2c 838282d4 80481a47 [ 0.991367] 8042e3ec 00000001 804d38f0 00000204 83980000 00000065 8381bbe0 6f55b24f [ 0.999975] 00000000 00000000 80520000 00002018 00000000 00000075 00000007 00000000 [ 1.008583] 00000000 80480000 000ee811 00000000 00000000 00000000 80432c00 80248db8 [ 1.017196] 00000009 00000204 83980000 803ad7b0 00000000 801feeec 00000000 804d0000 [ 1.025804] ... [ 1.028325] Call Trace: [ 1.030875] [<8000aef8>] show_stack+0x58/0x100 [ 1.035513] [<8001f8b4>] __warn+0xe4/0x118 [ 1.039708] [<8001f9a4>] warn_slowpath_null+0x48/0x64 [ 1.044935] [<80248db8>] bgmac_enet_probe+0x1b4/0x5c4 [ 1.050101] [<802498e0>] bgmac_probe+0x558/0x590 [ 1.054906] [<80252fd0>] bcma_device_probe+0x38/0x70 [ 1.060017] [<8020e1e8>] really_probe+0x170/0x2e8 [ 1.064891] [<8020e714>] __driver_attach+0xa4/0xec [ 1.069784] [<8020c1e0>] bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0xb0 [ 1.074833] [<8020d590>] bus_add_driver+0xf8/0x218 [ 1.079731] [<8020ef24>] driver_register+0xcc/0x11c [ 1.084804] [<804b54cc>] bgmac_init+0x1c/0x44 [ 1.089258] [<8000121c>] do_one_initcall+0x7c/0x1a0 [ 1.094343] [<804a1d34>] kernel_init_freeable+0x150/0x218 [ 1.099886] [<803a082c>] kernel_init+0x10/0x104 [ 1.104583] [<80005878>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c [ 1.110107] ---[ end trace f441c0d873d1fb5b ]--- [ 1.114914] bgmac_bcma bcma0:2: Allocation of TX ring 0x200 failed [ 1.121215] bgmac_bcma bcma0:2: Unable to alloc memory for DMA [ 1.127626] bgmac_bcma: probe of bcma0:2 failed with error -12 [ 1.133838] bgmac_bcma: Broadcom 47xx GBit MAC driver loaded Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.19/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch')
-rw-r--r--target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.19/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch34
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.19/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.19/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..df9d434c9f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.19/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+--- a/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c
++++ b/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c
+@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_
+ int trx_num = 0; /* Number of found TRX partitions */
+ int possible_nvram_sizes[] = { 0x8000, 0xF000, 0x10000, };
+ int err;
++ bool found_nvram = false;
+
+ /*
+ * Some really old flashes (like AT45DB*) had smaller erasesize-s, but
+@@ -283,12 +284,23 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_
+ if (buf[0] == NVRAM_HEADER) {
+ bcm47xxpart_add_part(&parts[curr_part++], "nvram",
+ master->size - blocksize, 0);
++ found_nvram = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ kfree(buf);
+
++ if (!found_nvram) {
++ pr_err("can not find a nvram partition reserve last block\n");
++ bcm47xxpart_add_part(&parts[curr_part++], "nvram_guess",
++ master->size - blocksize * 2, MTD_WRITEABLE);
++ for (i = 0; i < curr_part; i++) {
++ if (parts[i].size + parts[i].offset == master->size)
++ parts[i].offset -= blocksize * 2;
++ }
++ }
++
+ /*
+ * Assume that partitions end at the beginning of the one they are
+ * followed by.