brcm2708: rename all patches from raspberrypi git tree to use 950 prefix

Right now all brcm2708 patches are extracted from the non-mainline
raspberrypi/linux git tree. Many of them are hacks and/or are unneeded
in LEDE. Raspberry Pi is getting better and better mainline support so
it would be nice to finally start maintaining patches in a cleaner way:
1) Backport patches accepted in upstream tree
2) Start using upstream drivers
3) Pick only these patches that are needed for more complete support

Handling above tasks requires grouping patches - ideally using the same
prefixes as generic ones. It means we should rename existing patches to
use some high prefix. This will allow e.g. use 0xx for backported code.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stijn Tintel <stijn@linux-ipv6.be>

1 files changed, 72 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.9/950-0131-ARM64-Round-Robin-dispatch-IRQs-between-CPUs.patch b/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.9/950-0131-ARM64-Round-Robin-dispatch-IRQs-between-CPUs.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d11ca6bffd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.9/950-0131-ARM64-Round-Robin-dispatch-IRQs-between-CPUs.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+From 3a9b48156c6681e846d1a7dbe4ecbb3ae14c2f3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Michael Zoran <mzoran@crowfest.net>
+Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 21:43:57 -0800
+Subject: [PATCH] ARM64: Round-Robin dispatch IRQs between CPUs.
+
+IRQ-CPU mapping is round robined on ARM64 to increase
+concurrency and allow multiple interrupts to be serviced
+at a time.  This reduces the need for FIQ.
+
+Signed-off-by: Michael Zoran <mzoran@crowfest.net>
+---
+ drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2835.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
+ drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2836.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
+ 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2835.c
++++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2835.c
+@@ -168,10 +168,23 @@ static void armctrl_unmask_irq(struct ir
+ 	}
+ }
+ 
++#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
++void bcm2836_arm_irqchip_spin_gpu_irq(void);
++
++static void armctrl_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
++{
++	bcm2836_arm_irqchip_spin_gpu_irq();
++}
++
++#endif
++
+ static struct irq_chip armctrl_chip = {
+ 	.name = "ARMCTRL-level",
+ 	.irq_mask = armctrl_mask_irq,
+-	.irq_unmask = armctrl_unmask_irq
++	.irq_unmask = armctrl_unmask_irq,
++#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
++	.irq_ack    = armctrl_ack_irq
++#endif
+ };
+ 
+ static int armctrl_xlate(struct irq_domain *d, struct device_node *ctrlr,
+--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2836.c
++++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2836.c
+@@ -145,6 +145,27 @@ static void bcm2836_arm_irqchip_unmask_g
+ {
+ }
+ 
++#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
++
++void bcm2836_arm_irqchip_spin_gpu_irq(void)
++{
++	u32 i;
++	void __iomem *gpurouting = (intc.base + LOCAL_GPU_ROUTING);
++	u32 routing_val = readl(gpurouting);
++
++	for (i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
++		u32 new_routing_val = (routing_val + i) & 3;
++
++		if (cpu_active(new_routing_val)) {
++			writel(new_routing_val, gpurouting);
++			return;
++		}
++	}
++}
++EXPORT_SYMBOL(bcm2836_arm_irqchip_spin_gpu_irq);
++
++#endif
++
+ static struct irq_chip bcm2836_arm_irqchip_gpu = {
+ 	.name		= "bcm2836-gpu",
+ 	.irq_mask	= bcm2836_arm_irqchip_mask_gpu_irq,