aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohn Crispin <john@openwrt.org>2016-03-08 18:11:49 +0000
committerJohn Crispin <john@openwrt.org>2016-03-08 18:11:49 +0000
commitcd2114e19ceffb17b0f093718334148859f1adac (patch)
tree62158040bf861945a26eafea53f100f9db69b202 /target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch
parent7099b6c416c511fb943d2f32ef7daf8abcda858c (diff)
downloadupstream-cd2114e19ceffb17b0f093718334148859f1adac.tar.gz
upstream-cd2114e19ceffb17b0f093718334148859f1adac.tar.bz2
upstream-cd2114e19ceffb17b0f093718334148859f1adac.zip
brcm2708: update linux 4.4 patches to latest version
As usual these patches were extracted from the raspberry pi repo: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/tree/rpi-4.4.y Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com> SVN-Revision: 48966
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch')
-rw-r--r--target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch b/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch
index a970d04243..730355aea6 100644
--- a/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch
+++ b/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-From 72d3af528b1ac1e2606d252d49f3f50281976f5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 482f2b3e97e919ac0ebc55a6040747495563b9a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:32:24 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH 095/156] drm/vc4: Use job_lock to protect seqno_cb_list.
+Subject: [PATCH 095/170] drm/vc4: Use job_lock to protect seqno_cb_list.
We're (mostly) not supposed to be using struct_mutex in drivers these
days.