docs: deleting docs because they are obsolete

the docs in /docs folder are pretty much obsolete and in a not very friendly format (latex, that requires to be
compiled), leaving them there only causes confusion.
LEDE documentation's place is the wiki, or the site.

Signed-off-by: Alberto Bursi <alberto.bursi@outlook.it>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 52 deletions

diff --git a/docs/bugs.tex b/docs/bugs.tex
deleted file mode 100644
index 9c46b5a7e6..0000000000
--- a/docs/bugs.tex
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
-OpenWrt as an open source software opens its development to the community by
-having a publicly browseable subversion repository. The Trac software which
-comes along with a Subversion frontend,  a Wiki and a ticket reporting system 
-is used as an interface between developers, users and contributors in order to 
-make the whole development process much easier and efficient.
-
-We make distinction between two kinds of people within the Trac system:
-
-\begin{itemize}
-\item developers, able to report, close and fix tickets
-\item reporters, able to add a comment, patch, or request ticket status
-\end{itemize}
-
-\subsubsection{Opening a ticket}
-
-A reporter might want to open a ticket for the following reasons:
-
-\begin{itemize}
-\item a bug affects a specific hardware and/or software and needs to be fixed
-\item a specific software package would be seen as part of the official OpenWrt repository
-\item a feature should be added or removed from OpenWrt
-\end{itemize}
-
-Regarding the kind of ticket that is open, a patch is welcome in those cases:
-
-\begin{itemize}
-\item new package to be included in OpenWrt
-\item fix for a bug that works for the reporter and has no known side effect
-\item new features that can be added by modifying existing OpenWrt files
-\end{itemize}
-
-Once the ticket is open, a developer will take care of it, if so, the ticket is marked
-as "accepted" with the developer name. You can add comments at any time to the ticket,
-even when it is closed.
-
-\subsubsection{Closing a ticket}
-
-A ticket might be closed by a developer because:
-
-\begin{itemize}
-\item the problem is already fixed (wontfix)
-\item the problem described is not judged as valid, and comes along with an explanation why (invalid)
-\item the developers know that this bug will be fixed upstream (wontfix)
-\item the problem is very similar to something that has already been reported (duplicate)
-\item the problem cannot be reproduced by the developers (worksforme)
-\end{itemize}
-
-At the same time, the reporter may want to get the ticket closed since he is not 
-longer able to trigger the bug, or found it invalid by himself.
-
-When a ticket is closed by a developer and marked as "fixed", the comment contains 
-the subversion changeset which corrects the bug.