From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:25:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: testing the wrong variable in brcmf_rx_hdrpull()

Smatch complains about this code:

    drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c:335 brcmf_rx_hdrpull()
    error: we previously assumed '*ifp' could be null (see line 333)

The problem is that we recently changed these from "ifp" to "*ifp" but
there was one that we didn't update.

-       if (ret || !ifp || !ifp->ndev) {
+       if (ret || !(*ifp) || !(*ifp)->ndev) {
                if (ret != -ENODATA && ifp)
                                       ^^^
-                       ifp->stats.rx_errors++;
+                       (*ifp)->stats.rx_errors++;

I have updated it to *ifp as well.  We always call this function is a
non-NULL "ifp" pointer, btw.

Fixes: c462ebcdfe42 ('brcmfmac: create common function for handling brcmf_proto_hdrpull()')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
---

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static int brcmf_rx_hdrpull(struct brcmf
 	ret = brcmf_proto_hdrpull(drvr, true, skb, ifp);
 
 	if (ret || !(*ifp) || !(*ifp)->ndev) {
-		if (ret != -ENODATA && ifp)
+		if (ret != -ENODATA && *ifp)
 			(*ifp)->stats.rx_errors++;
 		brcmu_pkt_buf_free_skb(skb);
 		return -ENODATA;