summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-3.14/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-lower-minimal-blocksize-to-4Ki-from-.patch
blob: 5a8aad414f8ba4a607ca1191a778a3d6f40d960e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
From 4586bc54a322568d5258d6a1b04e361d4a95597b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:06:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH][RFC] mtd: bcm47xxpart: lower minimal blocksize to 4Ki (from
 64Ki)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Some devices like Netgear WNR1000v3 or WGR614v10 have partitions aligned
to 0x1000. Using bigger blocksize stopped us from detecting some parts.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
---
Most of supported devices use flashes with erasesize 0x10000 (64Ki), so
this change shouldn't affect them (no regressions expected).
Any objections?
---
 drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c b/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c
index dfd57a0..948f535 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c
@@ -95,8 +95,12 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_info *master,
 	int possible_nvram_sizes[] = { 0x8000, 0xF000, 0x10000, };
 	bool found_nvram = false;
 
-	if (blocksize <= 0x10000)
-		blocksize = 0x10000;
+	/*
+	 * Some really old flashes (like AT45DB*) had smaller erasesize-s, but
+	 * partitions were aligned to at least 0x1000 anyway.
+	 */
+	if (blocksize < 0x1000)
+		blocksize = 0x1000;
 
 	/* Alloc */
 	parts = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mtd_partition) * BCM47XXPART_MAX_PARTS,
-- 
1.8.4.5