From 1a392636a5b5694178d5f802efa9c220ff9dbabf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Crispin Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:24:34 +0000 Subject: ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach. The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target: * fixes wrong indentation * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body) * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files) * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds) Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz SVN-Revision: 46664 --- target/linux/ramips/dts/F7C027.dts | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'target/linux/ramips/dts/F7C027.dts') diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/F7C027.dts b/target/linux/ramips/dts/F7C027.dts index 874d606bdc..89e93568fa 100644 --- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/F7C027.dts +++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/F7C027.dts @@ -86,22 +86,22 @@ compatible = "gpio-leds"; status { - label = "belkin:blue:status"; + label = "f7c027:blue:status"; gpios = <&gpio0 7 1>; }; power { - label = "belkin:blue:power"; + label = "f7c027:blue:power"; gpios = <&gpio0 9 1>; }; orange { - label = "belkin:orange:status"; + label = "f7c027:orange:status"; gpios = <&gpio0 11 1>; }; relay { - label = "belkin:device:relay"; + label = "f7c027:device:relay"; gpios = <&gpio0 13 0>; }; }; -- cgit v1.2.3