From 1a392636a5b5694178d5f802efa9c220ff9dbabf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Crispin Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:24:34 +0000 Subject: ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach. The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target: * fixes wrong indentation * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body) * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files) * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds) Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz SVN-Revision: 46664 --- target/linux/ramips/dts/DIR-300-B1.dts | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'target/linux/ramips/dts/DIR-300-B1.dts') diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/DIR-300-B1.dts b/target/linux/ramips/dts/DIR-300-B1.dts index e1962d5468..6d19f651d8 100644 --- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/DIR-300-B1.dts +++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/DIR-300-B1.dts @@ -82,27 +82,27 @@ compatible = "gpio-leds"; status { - label = "d-link:amber:status"; + label = "dir-300-b1:amber:status"; gpios = <&gpio0 8 1>; }; status2 { - label = "d-link:green:status"; + label = "dir-300-b1:green:status"; gpios = <&gpio0 9 1>; }; wan { - label = "d-link:amber:wan"; + label = "dir-300-b1:amber:wan"; gpios = <&gpio0 14 1>; }; wan2 { - label = "d-link:green:wan"; + label = "dir-300-b1:green:wan"; gpios = <&gpio0 12 1>; }; wps { - label = "d-link:blue:wps"; + label = "dir-300-b1:blue:wps"; gpios = <&gpio0 13 1>; }; }; -- cgit v1.2.3