openwrt/em-br6478acv2/lede/master-31e0f0ae - Edimax BR-6578AC V2 base from https://github.com/ulli-kroll/lede.git

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	packages: prefer http over git for git protocol	Hauke Mehrtens	2016-06-22	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	In company networks everything except the http and https protocol is often causes problems, because the network administrators try to block everything else. To make it easier to use LEDE in company networks use the https/http protocol for git access when possible. Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
*	uboot-*: update license info in uboot packages	Luka Perkov	2014-11-29	1	-0/+3
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov <luka@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 43429
*	license info - revert r43155	John Crispin	2014-11-03	1	-3/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info. Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 43167
*	Add more license tags with SPDX identifiers	John Crispin	2014-11-03	1	-0/+3
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied together - each with different licensing information in the file headers. I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license in my opinion. However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information and/or did not miss license information. Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de> SVN-Revision: 43155
*	move boot related packages to their own folder	John Crispin	2012-10-16	2	-0/+102
	SVN-Revision: 33781