From 849369d6c66d3054688672f97d31fceb8e8230fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: root <root@artemis.panaceas.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 04:40:36 +0000
Subject: initial_commit

---
 arch/arm/include/asm/mutex.h | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/mutex.h

(limited to 'arch/arm/include/asm/mutex.h')

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mutex.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mutex.h
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..93226cf2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mutex.h
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm/include/asm/mutex.h
+ *
+ * ARM optimized mutex locking primitives
+ *
+ * Please look into asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h for a formal definition.
+ */
+#ifndef _ASM_MUTEX_H
+#define _ASM_MUTEX_H
+
+#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 6
+/* On pre-ARMv6 hardware the swp based implementation is the most efficient. */
+# include <asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h>
+#else
+
+/*
+ * Attempting to lock a mutex on ARMv6+ can be done with a bastardized
+ * atomic decrement (it is not a reliable atomic decrement but it satisfies
+ * the defined semantics for our purpose, while being smaller and faster
+ * than a real atomic decrement or atomic swap.  The idea is to attempt
+ * decrementing the lock value only once.  If once decremented it isn't zero,
+ * or if its store-back fails due to a dispute on the exclusive store, we
+ * simply bail out immediately through the slow path where the lock will be
+ * reattempted until it succeeds.
+ */
+static inline void
+__mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
+{
+	int __ex_flag, __res;
+
+	__asm__ (
+
+		"ldrex	%0, [%2]	\n\t"
+		"sub	%0, %0, #1	\n\t"
+		"strex	%1, %0, [%2]	"
+
+		: "=&r" (__res), "=&r" (__ex_flag)
+		: "r" (&(count)->counter)
+		: "cc","memory" );
+
+	__res |= __ex_flag;
+	if (unlikely(__res != 0))
+		fail_fn(count);
+}
+
+static inline int
+__mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
+{
+	int __ex_flag, __res;
+
+	__asm__ (
+
+		"ldrex	%0, [%2]	\n\t"
+		"sub	%0, %0, #1	\n\t"
+		"strex	%1, %0, [%2]	"
+
+		: "=&r" (__res), "=&r" (__ex_flag)
+		: "r" (&(count)->counter)
+		: "cc","memory" );
+
+	__res |= __ex_flag;
+	if (unlikely(__res != 0))
+		__res = fail_fn(count);
+	return __res;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Same trick is used for the unlock fast path. However the original value,
+ * rather than the result, is used to test for success in order to have
+ * better generated assembly.
+ */
+static inline void
+__mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
+{
+	int __ex_flag, __res, __orig;
+
+	__asm__ (
+
+		"ldrex	%0, [%3]	\n\t"
+		"add	%1, %0, #1	\n\t"
+		"strex	%2, %1, [%3]	"
+
+		: "=&r" (__orig), "=&r" (__res), "=&r" (__ex_flag)
+		: "r" (&(count)->counter)
+		: "cc","memory" );
+
+	__orig |= __ex_flag;
+	if (unlikely(__orig != 0))
+		fail_fn(count);
+}
+
+/*
+ * If the unlock was done on a contended lock, or if the unlock simply fails
+ * then the mutex remains locked.
+ */
+#define __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock()	1
+
+/*
+ * For __mutex_fastpath_trylock we use another construct which could be
+ * described as a "single value cmpxchg".
+ *
+ * This provides the needed trylock semantics like cmpxchg would, but it is
+ * lighter and less generic than a true cmpxchg implementation.
+ */
+static inline int
+__mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
+{
+	int __ex_flag, __res, __orig;
+
+	__asm__ (
+
+		"1: ldrex	%0, [%3]	\n\t"
+		"subs		%1, %0, #1	\n\t"
+		"strexeq	%2, %1, [%3]	\n\t"
+		"movlt		%0, #0		\n\t"
+		"cmpeq		%2, #0		\n\t"
+		"bgt		1b		"
+
+		: "=&r" (__orig), "=&r" (__res), "=&r" (__ex_flag)
+		: "r" (&count->counter)
+		: "cc", "memory" );
+
+	return __orig;
+}
+
+#endif
+#endif
-- 
cgit v1.2.3