From 849369d6c66d3054688672f97d31fceb8e8230fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: root Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 04:40:36 +0000 Subject: initial_commit --- Documentation/cgroups/freezer-subsystem.txt | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/cgroups/freezer-subsystem.txt (limited to 'Documentation/cgroups/freezer-subsystem.txt') diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/freezer-subsystem.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/freezer-subsystem.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c21d7774 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/freezer-subsystem.txt @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +The cgroup freezer is useful to batch job management system which start +and stop sets of tasks in order to schedule the resources of a machine +according to the desires of a system administrator. This sort of program +is often used on HPC clusters to schedule access to the cluster as a +whole. The cgroup freezer uses cgroups to describe the set of tasks to +be started/stopped by the batch job management system. It also provides +a means to start and stop the tasks composing the job. + +The cgroup freezer will also be useful for checkpointing running groups +of tasks. The freezer allows the checkpoint code to obtain a consistent +image of the tasks by attempting to force the tasks in a cgroup into a +quiescent state. Once the tasks are quiescent another task can +walk /proc or invoke a kernel interface to gather information about the +quiesced tasks. Checkpointed tasks can be restarted later should a +recoverable error occur. This also allows the checkpointed tasks to be +migrated between nodes in a cluster by copying the gathered information +to another node and restarting the tasks there. + +Sequences of SIGSTOP and SIGCONT are not always sufficient for stopping +and resuming tasks in userspace. Both of these signals are observable +from within the tasks we wish to freeze. While SIGSTOP cannot be caught, +blocked, or ignored it can be seen by waiting or ptracing parent tasks. +SIGCONT is especially unsuitable since it can be caught by the task. Any +programs designed to watch for SIGSTOP and SIGCONT could be broken by +attempting to use SIGSTOP and SIGCONT to stop and resume tasks. We can +demonstrate this problem using nested bash shells: + + $ echo $$ + 16644 + $ bash + $ echo $$ + 16690 + + From a second, unrelated bash shell: + $ kill -SIGSTOP 16690 + $ kill -SIGCONT 16990 + + + +This happens because bash can observe both signals and choose how it +responds to them. + +Another example of a program which catches and responds to these +signals is gdb. In fact any program designed to use ptrace is likely to +have a problem with this method of stopping and resuming tasks. + +In contrast, the cgroup freezer uses the kernel freezer code to +prevent the freeze/unfreeze cycle from becoming visible to the tasks +being frozen. This allows the bash example above and gdb to run as +expected. + +The freezer subsystem in the container filesystem defines a file named +freezer.state. Writing "FROZEN" to the state file will freeze all tasks in the +cgroup. Subsequently writing "THAWED" will unfreeze the tasks in the cgroup. +Reading will return the current state. + +Note freezer.state doesn't exist in root cgroup, which means root cgroup +is non-freezable. + +* Examples of usage : + + # mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer + # mount -t cgroup -ofreezer freezer /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer + # mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/0 + # echo $some_pid > /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/0/tasks + +to get status of the freezer subsystem : + + # cat /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/0/freezer.state + THAWED + +to freeze all tasks in the container : + + # echo FROZEN > /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/0/freezer.state + # cat /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/0/freezer.state + FREEZING + # cat /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/0/freezer.state + FROZEN + +to unfreeze all tasks in the container : + + # echo THAWED > /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/0/freezer.state + # cat /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/0/freezer.state + THAWED + +This is the basic mechanism which should do the right thing for user space task +in a simple scenario. + +It's important to note that freezing can be incomplete. In that case we return +EBUSY. This means that some tasks in the cgroup are busy doing something that +prevents us from completely freezing the cgroup at this time. After EBUSY, +the cgroup will remain partially frozen -- reflected by freezer.state reporting +"FREEZING" when read. The state will remain "FREEZING" until one of these +things happens: + + 1) Userspace cancels the freezing operation by writing "THAWED" to + the freezer.state file + 2) Userspace retries the freezing operation by writing "FROZEN" to + the freezer.state file (writing "FREEZING" is not legal + and returns EINVAL) + 3) The tasks that blocked the cgroup from entering the "FROZEN" + state disappear from the cgroup's set of tasks. -- cgit v1.2.3