aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Rename lspcon_i2c_spi to parade_lspconThomas Heijligen2022-07-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The chip targeted by the `lspcon_i2c_spi` programmer is a Parade PS175. Rename the programmer to match the chips vendor / family instead of the generic LSPCON protocol. Remove the `_i2c_spi` ending in preparation to become an opaque master. The chip is visible on an Acer Chromebox CXI4. https://www.paradetech.com/products/ps175/ https://www.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/series/acerchromeboxcxi4 TEST: `make CONFIG_PARADE_LSPCON=yes` and `meson build -Dconfig_parade_lspcon=true` produces flashrom binaries with the parade_lspcon programmer included. Change-Id: I9148be6d9162c1722ff739929ca5e181b628dd57 Signed-off-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65547 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* spi: Add function to probe erase command opcode for all spi_masterAarya Chaumal2022-07-111-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a field, probe_opcode, to struct spi_master which points to a function returning a bool by checking if a given command is supported by the programmer in use. This is used for getting a whitelist of commands supported by the programmer, as some programmers like ichspi don't support all opcodes. Most programmers use the default function, which just returns true. ICHSPI and dummyflasher use their specialized function. Change-Id: I6852ef92788221f471a859c879f8aff42558d36d Signed-off-by: Aarya Chaumal <aarya.chaumal@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65183 Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* it85spi: EOL supportEdward O'Callaghan2022-07-041-3/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This code was originally introduced by ITE for now exceedingly old Chromebooks. The code has had very little attention to maintain it, unlikely tested for a long time and now seems to be just a technical burden to the flashrom project. If someone is later interested it could be resurrected for reference from git history. However, it needs quite a bit of work to bring it back into maintainable order. BUG=b:156143896,b:170689483 TEST=tree builds under meson+make and unit tests pass. Change-Id: I5e8cafd73db837941c518f0e2d72d8192274fd79 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65378 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* Add `str` extension to extract_programmer_param function nameChinmay Lonkar2022-07-022-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch changes the function name of extract_programmer_param() to extract_programmer_param_str() as this function name will clearly specify that it returns the value of the given parameter as a string. Signed-off-by: Chinmay Lonkar <chinmay20220@gmail.com> Change-Id: Id7b9fff4d3e1de22abd31b8123a1d237cd0f5c97 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65521 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net> Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
* spi25.c: Add function to return opcode of passed erase fucntion pointerAarya Chaumal2022-06-271-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | There is a function, spi_get_erasefn_from_opcode, which returns the erase function for given opcode. Add a function which does the opposite i.e. returns the opcode for given erase function. Change-Id: Ia3aefc9b9465efdd16b1678bb2ada9a23f00d316 Signed-off-by: Aarya Chaumal <aarya.chaumal@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65355 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
* flashchips,spi25: Replace `.wrea_override` with FEATURE_4BA_EAR_1716Nico Huber2022-06-232-12/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are two competing sets of instructions to access the extended address register of 4BA SPI chips. Some chips even support both sets. So far, we assumed the 0xc5/0xc8 instructions by default and allowed to override the write instructions with the `.wrea_override` field. This has some disadvantages: * The additional field is easily overlooked. So when adding a new flash chip, one might assume only 0xc5/0xc8 are supported. * We cannot describe flash chips completely that allow both instructions (and some programmers may be picky about which instructions can be used). Therefore, replace the `.wrea_override` field with a feature flag. Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Change-Id: I6d82f24898acd0789203516a7456fd785907bc10 Ticket: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/357 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64636 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
* flashchips: Rename FEATURE_4BA_EXT_ADDR -> _EAR_C5C8Nico Huber2022-06-221-5/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are two competing sets of instructions to access the extended address register of 4BA SPI chips. Some chips even support both sets. To prepare for other instructions than the default 0xc5/0xc8, rename the original feature flag. Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Change-Id: Iacb7b68a9e3444fe28873ff0fe5e3fab16643c8c Ticket: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/357 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64635 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
* writeprotect.c: Allow opaque masters to hook {read,write}_register()Edward O'Callaghan2022-06-212-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Allow specialisation in opaque masters, such as ichspi hwseq, to write to status registers. Also update the dispatch logic in libflashrom to call wp code when status register access functions are provided by an opaque master. BUG=none BRANCH=none TEST=flashrom --wp-status on AMD and Intel DUTs Change-Id: I3ab0d7f5f48338c8ecb118a69651c203fbc516ac Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Co-Authored-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64375 Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* flashchips: Add Spansion (today Infineon) S25FL128L and S25FL256LNico Huber2022-06-202-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These chips seem to be rather regular, supporting 2.7V..3.6V, the common erase block sizes 4KiB, 32KiB, 64KiB and the usual block- protection bits. Status/configuration register naming differs from other vendors, though. These chips have 2 status registers plus 3 configuration registers. Configuration registers 1 & 2 match status registers 2 & 3 of what we are used from other vendors. Read opcodes match too, however writes are always done through the WRSR instruction which can write up to 4 bytes (SR1, CR1, CR2, CR3). S25FL256L supports native 4BA commands and entering a 4BA mode. However, it uses an unusual opcode (0x53) for the 32KiB 4BA block erase. Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Change-Id: I356df6649f29e50879a4da4183f1164a81cb0a09 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64747 Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* spi25_statusreg: Allow WRSR_EXT for Status Register 3Nico Huber2022-06-202-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Spansion flash chips S25FL128L and S25FL256L use the WRSR instruction to write more than 2 registers. So align SR2 and SR3 support: The current FEATURE_WRSR_EXT is renamed to FEATURE_WRSR_EXT2 and FEATURE_WRSR_EXT3 is added. Also, WRSR3 needs a separate flag now. Verified that FEATURE_WRSR_EXT2 still works using the `dummy_flasher`. Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Change-Id: Ibdfc6eb3d2cfecbf8da0493d067031ddb079a094 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64746 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
* dummyflasher: Wire variable size feature via opaque infraAnastasia Klimchuk2022-06-161-3/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Wire "variable size" feature in dummy programmer via opaque infra. This patch fixes the broken build with CONFIG_DUMMY=no. Dummyflasher registers opaque master for the case when it is initialised with EMULATE_VARIABLE_SIZE. Dummy opaque master emulates read/write/erase as simple memory operations over `data->flashchip_contents`. The feature works via "Opaque flash chip" in flashchips.c which has one block eraser at the moment. If this changes in future, each block eraser needs to be updated in `probe_variable_size`. Fixes: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/365 TEST=the following scenarious run successfully Testing build $ make clean && make CONFIG_DUMMY=no $ flashrom -h : dummy is not in the list $ make clean && make CONFIG_EVERYTHING=yes $ flashrom -h : dummy is in the list Testing "variable size" feature $ flashrom -p dummy:size=8388608,emulate=VARIABLE_SIZE -V $ flashrom -p dummy:size=8388608,emulate=VARIABLE_SIZE -r /tmp/dump.bin -V $ head -c 8388608 </dev/urandom >/tmp/image.bin $ flashrom -p dummy:image=/tmp/image.bin,size=8388608,emulate=VARIABLE_SIZE -w /tmp/dump.bin -V also same as above with erase_to_zero=yes Testing standard flow $ flashrom -p dummy:emulate=W25Q128FV -V $ flashrom -p dummy:emulate=W25Q128FV -r /tmp/dump.bin -V $ head -c 16777216 </dev/urandom >/tmp/image.bin $ flashrom -p dummy:image=/tmp/image.bin,emulate=W25Q128FV -w /tmp/dump.bin -V Testing invalid combination of programmer params (`init_data` fails and prints error message which is WAI) $ flashrom -p dummy:size=8388608 -V -> init_data: size parameter is only valid for VARIABLE_SIZE chip. $ flashrom -p dummy:emulate=VARIABLE_SIZE -V -> init_data: the size parameter is not given. $ flashrom -p dummy:emulate=W25Q128FV,erase_to_zero=yes -V -> init_data: erase_to_zero parameter is not valid for real chip. Change-Id: I76402bfdf8b1a75489e4509fec92c9a777d0cf58 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64488 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* tree: Consolidate BIT() macroEdward O'Callaghan2022-06-101-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | Change-Id: I7e61f7671b70ca5ed751d99405714436bcd18d5a Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64962 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
* Add W25Q512NW-IM ID to flashromAtul Dhudase2022-06-071-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add Winbond W25Q512NW-IM chip ID and specs to flashrom. BUG=b:200173901 BRANCH=none TEST=flash W25Q512NW-IM using CCD. Original-Change-Id: I9debeda01d77444a5ebe9808ff80a337f320ef65 Original-Signed-off-by: Atul Dhudase <adhudase@codeaurora.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/flashrom/+/3171890 Original-Reviewed-by: Shelley Chen <shchen@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: Shelley Chen <shchen@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Shelley Chen <shchen@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit facb282e8939b8e4ad15d2478ed9ef86d98aed61) Note: this commit was cherry-picked from the cros tree but includes corrections to errors in the original commit's 4BA feature flags that were spotted by Angel Pons Change-Id: I9debeda01d77444a5ebe9808ff80a337f320ef65 Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64405 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* libflashrom: Return progress state to the library userRichard Hughes2022-05-252-1/+33
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Projects using libflashrom like fwupd expect the user to wait for the operation to complete. To avoid the user thinking the process has "hung" or "got stuck" report back the progress complete of the erase, write and read operations. Add a new --progress flag to the CLI to report progress of operations. Include a test for the dummy spi25 device. TEST=./test_build.sh; ./flashrom -p lspcon_i2c_spi:bus=7 -r /dev/null --progress Change-Id: I7197572bb7f19e3bdb2bde855d70a0f50fd3854c Signed-off-by: Richard Hughes <richard@hughsie.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/49643 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
* include/flash.h: Drop dead struct membersEdward O'Callaghan2022-05-171-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | These were part of the original wp implementation, now dead code left over. Change-Id: I43b25175c6ff833b822a93c4e752a28cf97d64b8 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64373 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* flashrom.c: Make need_erase() helper static localEdward O'Callaghan2022-05-171-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | The need_erase() helper is only used within flashrom.c Change-Id: Ic0946bb109fca2fc18e15eefa11cccea284ded0b Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64369 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* flashrom: Drop read_flash_to_file() usageEdward O'Callaghan2022-05-131-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Aspire towards a goal of making cli_classic more of just a user of libflashrom than having quasi-parallel paths in flashrom.c This converts remaining read_flash_to_file() usage to the do_read() provider wrapper around libflashrom. BUG=b:208132085 TEST=` sudo ./flashrom -p ft2232_spi:type=232H,divisor=1000 -f -r out -c W25X05 Flashrom output: No EEPROM/flash device found. Force read (-f -r -c) requested, pretending the chip is there: Assuming Winbond flash chip "W25X05" (64 kB, SPI) on ft2232_spi. Please note that forced reads most likely contain garbage. Block protection could not be disabled! Reading flash... done. Data read: xxd out-1khz 00000000: 0000 07ff ffff e000 0000 7fff fffe 0000 ................ 00000010: 0007 ffff ffe0 0000 007f ffff fe00 0000 ................ 00000020: 07ff ffff e000 0000 7fff fffe 0000 0007 ................ 00000030: ffff ffe0 0000 007f ffff fe00 0000 0fff ................ xxd out-100khz 00000000: b6db 6db6 db6d b6db 6db6 db6d b6db 6db6 ..m..m..m..m..m. 00000010: db6d b6db 6db6 db6d b6db 6db6 db6d b6db .m..m..m..m..m.. 00000020: 6db6 db6d b6db 6db6 db24 9249 2492 4924 m..m..m..$.I$.I$ 00000030: 9249 2492 4924 9249 2492 4924 9249 2492 .I$.I$.I$.I$.I$. ` Change-Id: I4b690b688acf9d5deb46e8642a252a2132ea8c73 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com> Tested-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59291 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
* platform/swap: move swap inline functions & macros into an own headerThomas Heijligen2022-05-082-53/+80
| | | | | | | | | | | | | These inline functions and macros are only used in platform/endian_(big|little).c and do not need to be compiled into every object which includes `platform.h`. Change-Id: Ib2326e6a4eb5e000a0eace857d040372e2e9e561 Signed-off-by: Thomas Heijligen <thomas.heijligen@secunet.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63825 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
* libflashrom: Move documentation to headerEvan Benn2022-05-061-40/+437
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The doxygen documentation was in the libflashrom.c file. Move the documentation to the libflashrom.h file. This allows foreign function interface binding generators (eg rust bindgen) that operate on the .h file to generate documentation for the target language. Some doxygen errors were also corrected, mostly undocumented or wrongly labeled parameters. To test, I have diffed and inspected the doxygen documentation before and after the change. All functions are documented the same, and the structs and enums are now also included in the docs. Change-Id: I856b74d5bfea13722539be15496755a95e701eea Signed-off-by: Evan Benn <evanbenn@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63903 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
* Global cleanup: Fix a few spelling errorsMartin Roth2022-05-032-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Just a trivial patch to fix a few errors found by codespell. Here's the command I used: codespell -S subprojects,out \ -L fwe,dout,tast,crate,parms,claus,nt,nd,te,truns,trun Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> Change-Id: I4e3b277f220fa70dcab21912c30f1d26d9bd8749 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62840 Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* Introduce an `include` directory for header filesThomas Heijligen2022-04-2921-0/+4305
Move all header files to the new `include` directory. Adapt include directives and build systems to the new directory. Change-Id: Iaddd6bbfa0624b166d422f665877f096983bf4cf Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felix.singer@secunet.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Heijligen <thomas.heijligen@secunet.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58622 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-19 22:41:18 +0000