From 504064302bc9f3949b416d6f48b2f5835ac64514 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vincent Breitmoser Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 04:06:44 +0200 Subject: actually use iterator interface for ParcelableFileCache in activities --- .../org/sufficientlysecure/keychain/util/ParcelableFileCache.java | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'OpenKeychain/src/main/java/org/sufficientlysecure/keychain/util/ParcelableFileCache.java') diff --git a/OpenKeychain/src/main/java/org/sufficientlysecure/keychain/util/ParcelableFileCache.java b/OpenKeychain/src/main/java/org/sufficientlysecure/keychain/util/ParcelableFileCache.java index 3b4facbd0..e6345b1c3 100644 --- a/OpenKeychain/src/main/java/org/sufficientlysecure/keychain/util/ParcelableFileCache.java +++ b/OpenKeychain/src/main/java/org/sufficientlysecure/keychain/util/ParcelableFileCache.java @@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ public class ParcelableFileCache { mFilename = filename; } + /** This method returns the number of entries as valid for the iterator + * received by the latest readCache operation. Yes, it is slightly + * peculiar. + */ public int getNumEntries() { return mNumEntries; } @@ -107,7 +111,7 @@ public class ParcelableFileCache { throw new IOException(e); } - // yes this is slightly sloppy data flow. WE WOULDN'T NEED THIS WITH TUPLE RETURN TYPES + // yes this is sloppy data flow. WE WOULDN'T NEED THIS WITH TUPLE RETURN TYPES mNumEntries = ois.readInt(); return new Iterator() { -- cgit v1.2.3