From dfa41d090260eed63f3d8510571a2f6236a5ff45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kenny Root Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 05:58:42 +0000 Subject: Initial import. --- .../trilead/ssh2/transport/TransportManager.java | 776 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 776 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/com/trilead/ssh2/transport/TransportManager.java (limited to 'src/com/trilead/ssh2/transport/TransportManager.java') diff --git a/src/com/trilead/ssh2/transport/TransportManager.java b/src/com/trilead/ssh2/transport/TransportManager.java new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f577c2b --- /dev/null +++ b/src/com/trilead/ssh2/transport/TransportManager.java @@ -0,0 +1,776 @@ + +package com.trilead.ssh2.transport; + +import java.io.IOException; +import java.io.InputStream; +import java.io.OutputStream; +import java.net.InetAddress; +import java.net.InetSocketAddress; +import java.net.Socket; +import java.net.UnknownHostException; +import java.security.SecureRandom; +import java.util.Vector; + +import com.trilead.ssh2.ConnectionInfo; +import com.trilead.ssh2.ConnectionMonitor; +import com.trilead.ssh2.DHGexParameters; +import com.trilead.ssh2.HTTPProxyData; +import com.trilead.ssh2.HTTPProxyException; +import com.trilead.ssh2.ProxyData; +import com.trilead.ssh2.ServerHostKeyVerifier; +import com.trilead.ssh2.crypto.Base64; +import com.trilead.ssh2.crypto.CryptoWishList; +import com.trilead.ssh2.crypto.cipher.BlockCipher; +import com.trilead.ssh2.crypto.digest.MAC; +import com.trilead.ssh2.log.Logger; +import com.trilead.ssh2.packets.PacketDisconnect; +import com.trilead.ssh2.packets.Packets; +import com.trilead.ssh2.packets.TypesReader; +import com.trilead.ssh2.util.Tokenizer; + + +/* + * Yes, the "standard" is a big mess. On one side, the say that arbitary channel + * packets are allowed during kex exchange, on the other side we need to blindly + * ignore the next _packet_ if the KEX guess was wrong. Where do we know from that + * the next packet is not a channel data packet? Yes, we could check if it is in + * the KEX range. But the standard says nothing about this. The OpenSSH guys + * block local "normal" traffic during KEX. That's fine - however, they assume + * that the other side is doing the same. During re-key, if they receive traffic + * other than KEX, they become horribly irritated and kill the connection. Since + * we are very likely going to communicate with OpenSSH servers, we have to play + * the same game - even though we could do better. + * + * btw: having stdout and stderr on the same channel, with a shared window, is + * also a VERY good idea... =( + */ + +/** + * TransportManager. + * + * @author Christian Plattner, plattner@trilead.com + * @version $Id: TransportManager.java,v 1.1 2007/10/15 12:49:56 cplattne Exp $ + */ +public class TransportManager +{ + private static final Logger log = Logger.getLogger(TransportManager.class); + + class HandlerEntry + { + MessageHandler mh; + int low; + int high; + } + + private final Vector asynchronousQueue = new Vector(); + private Thread asynchronousThread = null; + + class AsynchronousWorker extends Thread + { + public void run() + { + while (true) + { + byte[] msg = null; + + synchronized (asynchronousQueue) + { + if (asynchronousQueue.size() == 0) + { + /* After the queue is empty for about 2 seconds, stop this thread */ + + try + { + asynchronousQueue.wait(2000); + } + catch (InterruptedException e) + { + /* OKOK, if somebody interrupts us, then we may die earlier. */ + } + + if (asynchronousQueue.size() == 0) + { + asynchronousThread = null; + return; + } + } + + msg = asynchronousQueue.remove(0); + } + + /* The following invocation may throw an IOException. + * There is no point in handling it - it simply means + * that the connection has a problem and we should stop + * sending asynchronously messages. We do not need to signal that + * we have exited (asynchronousThread = null): further + * messages in the queue cannot be sent by this or any + * other thread. + * Other threads will sooner or later (when receiving or + * sending the next message) get the same IOException and + * get to the same conclusion. + */ + + try + { + sendMessage(msg); + } + catch (IOException e) + { + return; + } + } + } + } + + String hostname; + int port; + final Socket sock = new Socket(); + + Object connectionSemaphore = new Object(); + + boolean flagKexOngoing = false; + boolean connectionClosed = false; + + Throwable reasonClosedCause = null; + + TransportConnection tc; + KexManager km; + + Vector messageHandlers = new Vector(); + + Thread receiveThread; + + Vector connectionMonitors = new Vector(); + boolean monitorsWereInformed = false; + + /** + * There were reports that there are JDKs which use + * the resolver even though one supplies a dotted IP + * address in the Socket constructor. That is why we + * try to generate the InetAdress "by hand". + * + * @param host + * @return the InetAddress + * @throws UnknownHostException + */ + private InetAddress createInetAddress(String host) throws UnknownHostException + { + /* Check if it is a dotted IP4 address */ + + InetAddress addr = parseIPv4Address(host); + + if (addr != null) + return addr; + + return InetAddress.getByName(host); + } + + private InetAddress parseIPv4Address(String host) throws UnknownHostException + { + if (host == null) + return null; + + String[] quad = Tokenizer.parseTokens(host, '.'); + + if ((quad == null) || (quad.length != 4)) + return null; + + byte[] addr = new byte[4]; + + for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) + { + int part = 0; + + if ((quad[i].length() == 0) || (quad[i].length() > 3)) + return null; + + for (int k = 0; k < quad[i].length(); k++) + { + char c = quad[i].charAt(k); + + /* No, Character.isDigit is not the same */ + if ((c < '0') || (c > '9')) + return null; + + part = part * 10 + (c - '0'); + } + + if (part > 255) /* 300.1.2.3 is invalid =) */ + return null; + + addr[i] = (byte) part; + } + + return InetAddress.getByAddress(host, addr); + } + + public TransportManager(String host, int port) throws IOException + { + this.hostname = host; + this.port = port; + } + + public int getPacketOverheadEstimate() + { + return tc.getPacketOverheadEstimate(); + } + + public void setTcpNoDelay(boolean state) throws IOException + { + sock.setTcpNoDelay(state); + } + + public void setSoTimeout(int timeout) throws IOException + { + sock.setSoTimeout(timeout); + } + + public ConnectionInfo getConnectionInfo(int kexNumber) throws IOException + { + return km.getOrWaitForConnectionInfo(kexNumber); + } + + public Throwable getReasonClosedCause() + { + synchronized (connectionSemaphore) + { + return reasonClosedCause; + } + } + + public byte[] getSessionIdentifier() + { + return km.sessionId; + } + + public void close(Throwable cause, boolean useDisconnectPacket) + { + if (useDisconnectPacket == false) + { + /* OK, hard shutdown - do not aquire the semaphore, + * perhaps somebody is inside (and waits until the remote + * side is ready to accept new data). */ + + try + { + sock.close(); + } + catch (IOException ignore) + { + } + + /* OK, whoever tried to send data, should now agree that + * there is no point in further waiting =) + * It is safe now to aquire the semaphore. + */ + } + + synchronized (connectionSemaphore) + { + if (connectionClosed == false) + { + if (useDisconnectPacket == true) + { + try + { + byte[] msg = new PacketDisconnect(Packets.SSH_DISCONNECT_BY_APPLICATION, cause.getMessage(), "") + .getPayload(); + if (tc != null) + tc.sendMessage(msg); + } + catch (IOException ignore) + { + } + + try + { + sock.close(); + } + catch (IOException ignore) + { + } + } + + connectionClosed = true; + reasonClosedCause = cause; /* may be null */ + } + connectionSemaphore.notifyAll(); + } + + /* No check if we need to inform the monitors */ + + Vector monitors = null; + + synchronized (this) + { + /* Short term lock to protect "connectionMonitors" + * and "monitorsWereInformed" + * (they may be modified concurrently) + */ + + if (monitorsWereInformed == false) + { + monitorsWereInformed = true; + monitors = (Vector) connectionMonitors.clone(); + } + } + + if (monitors != null) + { + for (int i = 0; i < monitors.size(); i++) + { + try + { + ConnectionMonitor cmon = (ConnectionMonitor) monitors.elementAt(i); + cmon.connectionLost(reasonClosedCause); + } + catch (Exception ignore) + { + } + } + } + } + + private void establishConnection(ProxyData proxyData, int connectTimeout) throws IOException + { + /* See the comment for createInetAddress() */ + + if (proxyData == null) + { + InetAddress addr = createInetAddress(hostname); + sock.connect(new InetSocketAddress(addr, port), connectTimeout); + sock.setSoTimeout(0); + return; + } + + if (proxyData instanceof HTTPProxyData) + { + HTTPProxyData pd = (HTTPProxyData) proxyData; + + /* At the moment, we only support HTTP proxies */ + + InetAddress addr = createInetAddress(pd.proxyHost); + sock.connect(new InetSocketAddress(addr, pd.proxyPort), connectTimeout); + sock.setSoTimeout(0); + + /* OK, now tell the proxy where we actually want to connect to */ + + StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(); + + sb.append("CONNECT "); + sb.append(hostname); + sb.append(':'); + sb.append(port); + sb.append(" HTTP/1.0\r\n"); + + if ((pd.proxyUser != null) && (pd.proxyPass != null)) + { + String credentials = pd.proxyUser + ":" + pd.proxyPass; + char[] encoded = Base64.encode(credentials.getBytes()); + sb.append("Proxy-Authorization: Basic "); + sb.append(encoded); + sb.append("\r\n"); + } + + if (pd.requestHeaderLines != null) + { + for (int i = 0; i < pd.requestHeaderLines.length; i++) + { + if (pd.requestHeaderLines[i] != null) + { + sb.append(pd.requestHeaderLines[i]); + sb.append("\r\n"); + } + } + } + + sb.append("\r\n"); + + OutputStream out = sock.getOutputStream(); + + out.write(sb.toString().getBytes()); + out.flush(); + + /* Now parse the HTTP response */ + + byte[] buffer = new byte[1024]; + InputStream in = sock.getInputStream(); + + int len = ClientServerHello.readLineRN(in, buffer); + + String httpReponse = new String(buffer, 0, len); + + if (httpReponse.startsWith("HTTP/") == false) + throw new IOException("The proxy did not send back a valid HTTP response."); + + /* "HTTP/1.X XYZ X" => 14 characters minimum */ + + if ((httpReponse.length() < 14) || (httpReponse.charAt(8) != ' ') || (httpReponse.charAt(12) != ' ')) + throw new IOException("The proxy did not send back a valid HTTP response."); + + int errorCode = 0; + + try + { + errorCode = Integer.parseInt(httpReponse.substring(9, 12)); + } + catch (NumberFormatException ignore) + { + throw new IOException("The proxy did not send back a valid HTTP response."); + } + + if ((errorCode < 0) || (errorCode > 999)) + throw new IOException("The proxy did not send back a valid HTTP response."); + + if (errorCode != 200) + { + throw new HTTPProxyException(httpReponse.substring(13), errorCode); + } + + /* OK, read until empty line */ + + while (true) + { + len = ClientServerHello.readLineRN(in, buffer); + if (len == 0) + break; + } + return; + } + + throw new IOException("Unsupported ProxyData"); + } + + public void initialize(CryptoWishList cwl, ServerHostKeyVerifier verifier, DHGexParameters dhgex, + int connectTimeout, SecureRandom rnd, ProxyData proxyData) throws IOException + { + /* First, establish the TCP connection to the SSH-2 server */ + + establishConnection(proxyData, connectTimeout); + + /* Parse the server line and say hello - important: this information is later needed for the + * key exchange (to stop man-in-the-middle attacks) - that is why we wrap it into an object + * for later use. + */ + + ClientServerHello csh = new ClientServerHello(sock.getInputStream(), sock.getOutputStream()); + + tc = new TransportConnection(sock.getInputStream(), sock.getOutputStream(), rnd); + + km = new KexManager(this, csh, cwl, hostname, port, verifier, rnd); + km.initiateKEX(cwl, dhgex); + + receiveThread = new Thread(new Runnable() + { + public void run() + { + try + { + receiveLoop(); + } + catch (IOException e) + { + close(e, false); + + if (log.isEnabled()) + log.log(10, "Receive thread: error in receiveLoop: " + e.getMessage()); + } + + if (log.isEnabled()) + log.log(50, "Receive thread: back from receiveLoop"); + + /* Tell all handlers that it is time to say goodbye */ + + if (km != null) + { + try + { + km.handleMessage(null, 0); + } + catch (IOException e) + { + } + } + + for (int i = 0; i < messageHandlers.size(); i++) + { + HandlerEntry he = messageHandlers.elementAt(i); + try + { + he.mh.handleMessage(null, 0); + } + catch (Exception ignore) + { + } + } + } + }); + + receiveThread.setDaemon(true); + receiveThread.start(); + } + + public void registerMessageHandler(MessageHandler mh, int low, int high) + { + HandlerEntry he = new HandlerEntry(); + he.mh = mh; + he.low = low; + he.high = high; + + synchronized (messageHandlers) + { + messageHandlers.addElement(he); + } + } + + public void removeMessageHandler(MessageHandler mh, int low, int high) + { + synchronized (messageHandlers) + { + for (int i = 0; i < messageHandlers.size(); i++) + { + HandlerEntry he = messageHandlers.elementAt(i); + if ((he.mh == mh) && (he.low == low) && (he.high == high)) + { + messageHandlers.removeElementAt(i); + break; + } + } + } + } + + public void sendKexMessage(byte[] msg) throws IOException + { + synchronized (connectionSemaphore) + { + if (connectionClosed) + { + throw (IOException) new IOException("Sorry, this connection is closed.").initCause(reasonClosedCause); + } + + flagKexOngoing = true; + + try + { + tc.sendMessage(msg); + } + catch (IOException e) + { + close(e, false); + throw e; + } + } + } + + public void kexFinished() throws IOException + { + synchronized (connectionSemaphore) + { + flagKexOngoing = false; + connectionSemaphore.notifyAll(); + } + } + + public void forceKeyExchange(CryptoWishList cwl, DHGexParameters dhgex) throws IOException + { + km.initiateKEX(cwl, dhgex); + } + + public void changeRecvCipher(BlockCipher bc, MAC mac) + { + tc.changeRecvCipher(bc, mac); + } + + public void changeSendCipher(BlockCipher bc, MAC mac) + { + tc.changeSendCipher(bc, mac); + } + + public void sendAsynchronousMessage(byte[] msg) throws IOException + { + synchronized (asynchronousQueue) + { + asynchronousQueue.addElement(msg); + + /* This limit should be flexible enough. We need this, otherwise the peer + * can flood us with global requests (and other stuff where we have to reply + * with an asynchronous message) and (if the server just sends data and does not + * read what we send) this will probably put us in a low memory situation + * (our send queue would grow and grow and...) */ + + if (asynchronousQueue.size() > 100) + throw new IOException("Error: the peer is not consuming our asynchronous replies."); + + /* Check if we have an asynchronous sending thread */ + + if (asynchronousThread == null) + { + asynchronousThread = new AsynchronousWorker(); + asynchronousThread.setDaemon(true); + asynchronousThread.start(); + + /* The thread will stop after 2 seconds of inactivity (i.e., empty queue) */ + } + } + } + + public void setConnectionMonitors(Vector monitors) + { + synchronized (this) + { + connectionMonitors = (Vector) monitors.clone(); + } + } + + public void sendMessage(byte[] msg) throws IOException + { + if (Thread.currentThread() == receiveThread) + throw new IOException("Assertion error: sendMessage may never be invoked by the receiver thread!"); + + synchronized (connectionSemaphore) + { + while (true) + { + if (connectionClosed) + { + throw (IOException) new IOException("Sorry, this connection is closed.") + .initCause(reasonClosedCause); + } + + if (flagKexOngoing == false) + break; + + try + { + connectionSemaphore.wait(); + } + catch (InterruptedException e) + { + } + } + + try + { + tc.sendMessage(msg); + } + catch (IOException e) + { + close(e, false); + throw e; + } + } + } + + public void receiveLoop() throws IOException + { + byte[] msg = new byte[35000]; + + while (true) + { + int msglen = tc.receiveMessage(msg, 0, msg.length); + + int type = msg[0] & 0xff; + + if (type == Packets.SSH_MSG_IGNORE) + continue; + + if (type == Packets.SSH_MSG_DEBUG) + { + if (log.isEnabled()) + { + TypesReader tr = new TypesReader(msg, 0, msglen); + tr.readByte(); + tr.readBoolean(); + StringBuffer debugMessageBuffer = new StringBuffer(); + debugMessageBuffer.append(tr.readString("UTF-8")); + + for (int i = 0; i < debugMessageBuffer.length(); i++) + { + char c = debugMessageBuffer.charAt(i); + + if ((c >= 32) && (c <= 126)) + continue; + debugMessageBuffer.setCharAt(i, '\uFFFD'); + } + + log.log(50, "DEBUG Message from remote: '" + debugMessageBuffer.toString() + "'"); + } + continue; + } + + if (type == Packets.SSH_MSG_UNIMPLEMENTED) + { + throw new IOException("Peer sent UNIMPLEMENTED message, that should not happen."); + } + + if (type == Packets.SSH_MSG_DISCONNECT) + { + TypesReader tr = new TypesReader(msg, 0, msglen); + tr.readByte(); + int reason_code = tr.readUINT32(); + StringBuffer reasonBuffer = new StringBuffer(); + reasonBuffer.append(tr.readString("UTF-8")); + + /* + * Do not get fooled by servers that send abnormal long error + * messages + */ + + if (reasonBuffer.length() > 255) + { + reasonBuffer.setLength(255); + reasonBuffer.setCharAt(254, '.'); + reasonBuffer.setCharAt(253, '.'); + reasonBuffer.setCharAt(252, '.'); + } + + /* + * Also, check that the server did not send charcaters that may + * screw up the receiver -> restrict to reasonable US-ASCII + * subset -> "printable characters" (ASCII 32 - 126). Replace + * all others with 0xFFFD (UNICODE replacement character). + */ + + for (int i = 0; i < reasonBuffer.length(); i++) + { + char c = reasonBuffer.charAt(i); + + if ((c >= 32) && (c <= 126)) + continue; + reasonBuffer.setCharAt(i, '\uFFFD'); + } + + throw new IOException("Peer sent DISCONNECT message (reason code " + reason_code + "): " + + reasonBuffer.toString()); + } + + /* + * Is it a KEX Packet? + */ + + if ((type == Packets.SSH_MSG_KEXINIT) || (type == Packets.SSH_MSG_NEWKEYS) + || ((type >= 30) && (type <= 49))) + { + km.handleMessage(msg, msglen); + continue; + } + + MessageHandler mh = null; + + for (int i = 0; i < messageHandlers.size(); i++) + { + HandlerEntry he = messageHandlers.elementAt(i); + if ((he.low <= type) && (type <= he.high)) + { + mh = he.mh; + break; + } + } + + if (mh == null) + throw new IOException("Unexpected SSH message (type " + type + ")"); + + mh.handleMessage(msg, msglen); + } + } +} -- cgit v1.2.3