From 33a81bffb9e3f856c1d3446d7292795774ae91a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dean Camera Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 10:58:35 +0000 Subject: Minor documentation updates. --- LUFA/ManPages/LUFAvsAtmelStack.txt | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'LUFA/ManPages/LUFAvsAtmelStack.txt') diff --git a/LUFA/ManPages/LUFAvsAtmelStack.txt b/LUFA/ManPages/LUFAvsAtmelStack.txt index b4fce2df0..239c2772b 100644 --- a/LUFA/ManPages/LUFAvsAtmelStack.txt +++ b/LUFA/ManPages/LUFAvsAtmelStack.txt @@ -5,11 +5,11 @@ */ /** - * \page Page_LUFAvsAtmelStack LUFA vs the Atmel Stack + * \page Page_LUFAvsAtmelStack LUFA vs the Atmel 8-bit USB AVR Stack * - * Atmel offers an official USB AVR stack, which may be incorporated into user projects and products. As LUFA and the Atmel - * stack aims to give roughly the same functionality to a design, it is often asked what advantages LUFA carries over the - * official Atmel USB stack. Below are just some of the advantages to choosing LUFA over the official stack. + * Atmel offers an official 8-bit USB AVR stack, which may be incorporated into user projects and products. As LUFA and the Atmel + * stack aims to give roughly the same functionality to a design, it is often asked what advantages LUFA carries over the official + * Atmel USB stack for the 8-bit USB AVRs. Below are just some of the advantages to choosing LUFA over the official Atmel stack. * * - Licensing: * LUFA is released under a very permissive MIT license (see \ref Page_LicenseInfo), while the Atmel stack carries several @@ -42,5 +42,11 @@ * - Better Library Support: * As many people are now using LUFA, there is a community being built around it. You can get answers to your LUFA related questions * quickly by either emailing the library author (subject to author's schedule) or by posting to the official LUFA support mailing list. + * + * - More Compact Code: + * LUFA is written from the ground up to compile optimally, using clean code and good design. Two demos giving the same functionality - + * the LUFA Low Level API Mouse Demo vs. the Atmel AVR270 HID Mouse application note shows LUFA to be the clear size winner *. + * + * * LUFA Low Level Mouse Demo: 3510 bytes, Atmel AVR270 Mouse Application Note: 4222 bytes, using an identical build environment. */ -- cgit v1.2.3