aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/googlemock/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'googlemock/test')
-rw-r--r--googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc14
-rw-r--r--googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_test.cc14
-rw-r--r--googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc7
-rw-r--r--googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc23
-rw-r--r--googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc30
5 files changed, 3 insertions, 85 deletions
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc
index f27d55aa..f918410e 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc
@@ -444,19 +444,12 @@ class IsNotZero : public ActionInterface<bool(int)> { // NOLINT
}
};
-#if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN
-// Compiling this test on Nokia's Symbian compiler fails with:
-// 'Result' is not a member of class 'testing::internal::Function<int>'
-// (point of instantiation: '@unnamed@gmock_actions_test_cc@::
-// ActionTest_CanBeConvertedToOtherActionType_Test::TestBody()')
-// with no obvious fix.
TEST(ActionTest, CanBeConvertedToOtherActionType) {
const Action<bool(int)> a1(new IsNotZero); // NOLINT
const Action<int(char)> a2 = Action<int(char)>(a1); // NOLINT
EXPECT_EQ(1, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple('a')));
EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple('\0')));
}
-#endif // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN
// The following two classes are for testing MakePolymorphicAction().
@@ -805,9 +798,7 @@ TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointee) {
EXPECT_EQ('a', ch);
}
-#if !((GTEST_GCC_VER_ && GTEST_GCC_VER_ < 40000) || GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN)
// Tests that SetArgPointee<N>() accepts a string literal.
-// GCC prior to v4.0 and the Symbian compiler do not support this.
TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, AcceptsStringLiteral) {
typedef void MyFunction(std::string*, const char**);
Action<MyFunction> a = SetArgPointee<0>("hi");
@@ -841,7 +832,6 @@ TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, AcceptsWideStringLiteral) {
# endif
}
-#endif
// Tests that SetArgPointee<N>() accepts a char pointer.
TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, AcceptsCharPointer) {
@@ -1448,10 +1438,6 @@ TEST(FunctorActionTest, UnusedArguments) {
}
// Test that basic built-in actions work with move-only arguments.
-// FIXME: Currently, almost all ActionInterface-based actions will not
-// work, even if they only try to use other, copyable arguments. Implement them
-// if necessary (but note that DoAll cannot work on non-copyable types anyway -
-// so maybe it's better to make users use lambdas instead.
TEST(MoveOnlyArgumentsTest, ReturningActions) {
Action<int(std::unique_ptr<int>)> a = Return(1);
EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(nullptr)));
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_test.cc
index 294b21d2..f29433f5 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_test.cc
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
#include "gmock/gmock.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
-// There is a bug in MSVC (fixed in VS 2008) that prevents creating a
-// mock for a function with const arguments, so we don't test such
-// cases for MSVC versions older than 2008.
-#if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || (_MSC_VER >= 1500)
-# define GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
-#endif // !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || (_MSC_VER >= 1500)
-
namespace testing {
namespace gmock_function_mocker_test {
@@ -84,9 +77,7 @@ class FooInterface {
virtual bool TakesNonConstReference(int& n) = 0; // NOLINT
virtual std::string TakesConstReference(const int& n) = 0;
-#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
virtual bool TakesConst(const int x) = 0;
-#endif // GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
virtual int OverloadedOnArgumentNumber() = 0;
virtual int OverloadedOnArgumentNumber(int n) = 0;
@@ -137,10 +128,7 @@ class MockFoo : public FooInterface {
MOCK_METHOD(bool, TakesNonConstReference, (int&)); // NOLINT
MOCK_METHOD(std::string, TakesConstReference, (const int&));
-
-#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
MOCK_METHOD(bool, TakesConst, (const int)); // NOLINT
-#endif
// Tests that the function return type can contain unprotected comma.
MOCK_METHOD((std::map<int, std::string>), ReturnTypeWithComma, (), ());
@@ -248,7 +236,6 @@ TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionWithConstReferenceArgument) {
EXPECT_EQ("Hello", foo_->TakesConstReference(a));
}
-#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
// Tests mocking a function that takes a const variable.
TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionWithConstArgument) {
EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, TakesConst(Lt(10)))
@@ -256,7 +243,6 @@ TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionWithConstArgument) {
EXPECT_FALSE(foo_->TakesConst(5));
}
-#endif // GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
// Tests mocking functions overloaded on the number of arguments.
TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionsOverloadedOnArgumentNumber) {
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc
index 4c36cfb8..b322f2d1 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc
@@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ TEST(GetRawPointerTest, WorksForSmartPointers) {
TEST(GetRawPointerTest, WorksForRawPointers) {
int* p = nullptr;
- // Don't use EXPECT_EQ as no NULL-testing magic on Symbian.
EXPECT_TRUE(nullptr == GetRawPointer(p));
int n = 1;
EXPECT_EQ(&n, GetRawPointer(&n));
@@ -521,12 +520,6 @@ TEST(TypeTraitsTest, is_reference) {
EXPECT_TRUE(is_reference<const int&>::value);
}
-TEST(TypeTraitsTest, is_pointer) {
- EXPECT_FALSE(is_pointer<int>::value);
- EXPECT_FALSE(is_pointer<char&>::value);
- EXPECT_TRUE(is_pointer<const int*>::value);
-}
-
TEST(TypeTraitsTest, type_equals) {
EXPECT_FALSE((type_equals<int, const int>::value));
EXPECT_FALSE((type_equals<int, int&>::value));
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc
index 03fa75b1..a35942d7 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc
@@ -1167,20 +1167,10 @@ TEST(IsNullTest, MatchesNullPointer) {
EXPECT_TRUE(m2.Matches(p2));
EXPECT_FALSE(m2.Matches("hi"));
-#if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN
- // Nokia's Symbian compiler generates:
- // gmock-matchers.h: ambiguous access to overloaded function
- // gmock-matchers.h: 'testing::Matcher<void *>::Matcher(void *)'
- // gmock-matchers.h: 'testing::Matcher<void *>::Matcher(const testing::
- // MatcherInterface<void *> *)'
- // gmock-matchers.h: (point of instantiation: 'testing::
- // gmock_matchers_test::IsNullTest_MatchesNullPointer_Test::TestBody()')
- // gmock-matchers.h: (instantiating: 'testing::PolymorphicMatc
Matcher<void*> m3 = IsNull();
void* p3 = nullptr;
EXPECT_TRUE(m3.Matches(p3));
EXPECT_FALSE(m3.Matches(reinterpret_cast<void*>(0xbeef)));
-#endif
}
TEST(IsNullTest, StdFunction) {
@@ -3168,20 +3158,8 @@ TEST(MatcherAssertionTest, WorksForByRefArguments) {
"Actual: 0" + OfType("int") + ", which is located @");
}
-#if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN
// Tests that ASSERT_THAT() and EXPECT_THAT() work when the matcher is
// monomorphic.
-
-// ASSERT_THAT("hello", starts_with_he) fails to compile with Nokia's
-// Symbian compiler: it tries to compile
-// template<T, U> class MatcherCastImpl { ...
-// virtual bool MatchAndExplain(T x, ...) const {
-// return source_matcher_.MatchAndExplain(static_cast<U>(x), ...);
-// with U == string and T == const char*
-// With ASSERT_THAT("hello"...) changed to ASSERT_THAT(string("hello") ... )
-// the compiler silently crashes with no output.
-// If MatcherCastImpl is changed to use U(x) instead of static_cast<U>(x)
-// the code compiles but the converted string is bogus.
TEST(MatcherAssertionTest, WorksForMonomorphicMatcher) {
Matcher<const char*> starts_with_he = StartsWith("he");
ASSERT_THAT("hello", starts_with_he);
@@ -3199,7 +3177,6 @@ TEST(MatcherAssertionTest, WorksForMonomorphicMatcher) {
"Expected: is > 5\n"
" Actual: 5" + OfType("int"));
}
-#endif // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN
// Tests floating-point matchers.
template <typename RawType>
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc
index 455e591c..0a201ed7 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc
@@ -294,21 +294,13 @@ TEST(NiceMockTest, MoveOnlyConstructor) {
NiceMock<MockBaz> nice_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly{});
}
-#if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
// Tests that NiceMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined
-// class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock). We had to work around an
-// MSVC 8.0 bug that caused the symbol Mock used in the definition of
-// NiceMock to be looked up in the wrong context, and this test
-// ensures that our fix works.
-//
-// We have to skip this test on Symbian and Windows Mobile, as it
-// causes the program to crash there, for reasons unclear to us yet.
+// class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock).
TEST(NiceMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) {
NiceMock< ::Mock> nice;
EXPECT_CALL(nice, DoThis());
nice.DoThis();
}
-#endif // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
TEST(NiceMockTest, IsNaggy_IsNice_IsStrict) {
NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
@@ -405,21 +397,13 @@ TEST(NaggyMockTest, MoveOnlyConstructor) {
NaggyMock<MockBaz> naggy_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly{});
}
-#if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
// Tests that NaggyMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined
-// class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock). We had to work around an
-// MSVC 8.0 bug that caused the symbol Mock used in the definition of
-// NaggyMock to be looked up in the wrong context, and this test
-// ensures that our fix works.
-//
-// We have to skip this test on Symbian and Windows Mobile, as it
-// causes the program to crash there, for reasons unclear to us yet.
+// class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock).
TEST(NaggyMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) {
NaggyMock< ::Mock> naggy;
EXPECT_CALL(naggy, DoThis());
naggy.DoThis();
}
-#endif // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
TEST(NaggyMockTest, IsNaggy_IsNice_IsStrict) {
NaggyMock<MockFoo> naggy_foo;
@@ -497,21 +481,13 @@ TEST(StrictMockTest, MoveOnlyConstructor) {
StrictMock<MockBaz> strict_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly{});
}
-#if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
// Tests that StrictMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined
-// class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock). We had to work around an
-// MSVC 8.0 bug that caused the symbol Mock used in the definition of
-// StrictMock to be looked up in the wrong context, and this test
-// ensures that our fix works.
-//
-// We have to skip this test on Symbian and Windows Mobile, as it
-// causes the program to crash there, for reasons unclear to us yet.
+// class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock).
TEST(StrictMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) {
StrictMock< ::Mock> strict;
EXPECT_CALL(strict, DoThis());
strict.DoThis();
}
-#endif // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
TEST(StrictMockTest, IsNaggy_IsNice_IsStrict) {
StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo;
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-07-09 17:46:26 +0000